Conspiracy Talk Archive December 14 2011

 

Use our posting form to send us conpiracy talk.

14 Dec 2011 19:46:24
Check this site out got this little weird creature that got beaten to death by some teenagers who feared for their lives

www.strangeworldofmystery.blogspot.com/2009_09_01_archive.html

MJ

Believable0 Unbelievable1

Saw a few programs on this, it was proven to be a sloth that had died and fallen into the water. the kids admitted they didn't kill it, it's hair fell off after time spent in the water. I was gutted, I was loving it!

Anything cryptozoological, I'm your man, I love all that.

RED_SKY

{Ed033's Note - I find it extremely hard to believe that all of the hair fell out just because of being in water.

Agree0 Disagree0

Check up on it Ed, its been proven - its absolutely blatant as well, looking at it, that its a sloth without hair. The hands/claws are the most blatant thing about it - plus, Sloths are abundant in central American countries.

I might be off about the fact that all it's hair came off due to it being in the water, but its 100%, undeniably a sloth.

THough I wish it was a weird gollum thing.

RED_SKY

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed033's Note - I didn't deny it was a sloth. I disbelieved all its hair fell out because of being in water.}

Agree1 Disagree0

I can't see anyone shaving it. But weirder things have happened I suppose, like making an alien out of bread and chicken skin (which by the way, was a fantastic effort)!

RED_SKY

Agree0 Disagree0

Poor sloth. pisses me rite off. people are so cruel to animals.

matty b

Agree0 Disagree0

No reason why it wouldn't fall out in water, firstly when an animal is in the water for a long period it will bloat therefore the pores holding the hair will expand meaning hair falls out (anyone who has ever seen a floating corpse will see this).

Als Sloths do have unusual hair, not only does it grow differently to most mammals it also contains it's own ecosystem as it is home to two symbitoic cyanobacteria, who knows how differently that would react, and even may have attracted fish who could have fed of the bacteria.

Agree0 Disagree0

14 Dec 2011 18:58:36
{Ed033's Note - There maybe micro evolution of a species altering slightly but where is the evidence of the macro evolution ie big changes from one species to another because of micro evolution. big changes do take place and appear to take place in one go and not because of micro evolution ie small changes that become big changes over millions of years time. Just no evidence for me. There is another mechanism at work. How we came about doesn't fit into the evolution model but if we were genetically tweaked would make sense. }
===========================
I do agree with you about the "another mechanism at work" , the evolution theory is incomplete.
But few months ago while rummaging through the kitchen cupboards , I found an old jar (year old maybe) where my wife had kidney beans stored, amongst the beans there were worms that evolved out of these beans and air .. would you call that macro evolution ? now if you take that change and multiply by billion years , that bean may .. just may produce a human.
Roy

Believable0 Unbelievable2

I've seen this myself with mung beans. "Eggs" are laid/injected into the food stuff then if you keep the food stuff for long enough the "eggs", "hatch" and bugs of some kind appear. There is no mystery there.

I don't agree with a lot of what David wilcock says but if you have lots of time you can watch 2012 event horizon to see some evolution mysteries - divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/831-2012eventhorizon

Agree1 Disagree0

I did not say there was any mystery there mate, the worms in my beans came about from the bacteria enclosed within the jar reacting with the bean to produce an organism million times its size in a relatively short time. as an example of macro evolution.
Roy {Ed001's Note - Roy what he was suggesting is that there were eggs in the beans which hatched, no evolution, just standard cycle of life.}

Agree0 Disagree1

14 dec 2011 18:19:56
watched project camelot interview with george kavassilas,its a bit new age stuff,but george defoo is convinced about 2012! infact its he is a matter of fact about it,makes you think.
frankyscouse

{Ed033's Note - I think george kavassilas is a complete fruit cake myself.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Deffo strange person edd, one thing thou he is not lying hes convinced about 2012, he got me thinking about religon as well, i am a roman catholic and the bit he said about catholism being the anti christ got me thinking. Frankys ouse

{Ed033's Note - No, I don't think he's lying. I think he's a nut case.}

Agree0 Disagree0

14 Dec 2011 03:02:18
Awrite ed033 have to say am a big fan of you helping inform everyone. I could do with some links though.. Heres where I stand. Illuminati is true i feel and information is being held back. However what your opinion on the giant skeletons that have been found, pictured, then been taken by governments? One was over 25feet! Maybe the giants the old testament was talking about? And what about astral travel etc? Had a terrifying moment with it myself. And finally what are your thoughts on the freeman on the land principle? I feel its the best way to stop the governments control. Anything i should be aware of? Thanks

{Ed033's Note - I think there are 3 questions there and a comment about the illuminati, I'll answer the 3 questions with 3 separate replies. I'll make a comment on the Illuminati. To me the illuminati cannot be 1 faction, there seems to be too much in-fighting so must be at least 2 factions.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

The top of the pyramid has been united for generations. The illuminati have been steadily unifying (papacy, jesuit, black nobility etc etc) as they have a common enemy - us. In our lifetime we may see the end result of this - it may begin on 21/12/2012..

{Ed033's Note - I see in-fighting and that is why I say there must be at least 2 factions.

Agree0 Disagree0

Freeman on the land/sovereign info is beneficial for people to look into to get a certain mind-set. The mind-set is unique to them but I think we need to start realising that people come first and companies/corporations are only there to benefit us not the other way round. In addition to this we might want to realise that 1% of the population having everything and the other 99% having nothing is a stupid system to be in. Below is a youtube clip where Norway have started down the correct route whereby the people of Norway share in the oil profits because they own the oil.

Here is a link to Vin's podcasts of TNS radio where if you listen to the podcasts, you get to hear more info about sovereignty which maybe beneficial to some people - www.tnsradio.com/vins-pods.html

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't know too much about astral travel myself. The Monroe Institute reckon with their courses, you can astral project / go out of body - www.monroeinstitute.org/gateway_voyage/about/



I think things related to astral travel which maybe helpful to people is the remote viewing information / remote viewing courses available. The following youtube link is not any recommendation by me but just gives some info - www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3c-V7cFrXw



On a similar note, even though this is not a recommendation from me as I haven't bought this course but David Wilcock reckons that his Access Your Higher Self Video would be beneficial to people - www.divinecosmos.com/amember/signup.php#7

Agree0 Disagree0

Can i ask Ed what infighting do you see?

{Ed033's Note - At least 1 faction wants to start a war in Syria and Iran and then start WW3 at a later date and at least 1 other faction doesn't. If there was only 1 faction then there would either be no planned war in Syria and Iran or they would have already started the war in Syria and Iran.

Agree0 Disagree0

Events do seem to be moving in that direction though.

{Ed033's Note - If you have 2 factions or more in-fighting, 1 of them is going to win out at some point.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Why not get rid of the other faction first?

usually happens, look at the soviets after Lenin'sd eath, trotsky vs stalin. Or the nazi's and the night of the long knives.

Agree0 Disagree1

Giants documentary

Agree0 Disagree0

14 Dec 2011 00:36:05

Robot head found on the moon - part of a Richard Hoagland interview with Project Camelot

Believable1 Unbelievable1

Hoagland is full of **** . Watch 4 or 5 of his interviews about different subjects and you will see this for yourself .
Project Camelot , themselves , say that they do not always agree with what their interviewees say . Why ? Bill and kerry know finding nuggets of truth often involves wading waist-deep in s**t .

jimi88

{Ed033's Note - Richard Hoagland is probably scared of having another "heart attack" if he tells us his "whole truth". Obviously Kerry and Bill don't trust Hoagland with certain aspects of what he says and you need to take what Hoagland says with a "pinch of salt" but there is some truth somewhere in what Hoagland says I believe.}

Agree1 Disagree0

Just looking at this guy's post, so doe's he believe star wars is real then, as it's a film, jedi is a religion and it starts by saying "a long time ago in a galaxy far far away", oh it must be!

Agree0 Disagree1

Ed033 .
I agree , Hoagland is best considered with a pinch of salt . Out of all the interviews i've seen on Camelot , he and Wilcox are the least convincing interviewees . Have you watched the Aaron McCollum interview ? That is waaaay out there and harder to swallow than a cactus

jimi88 {Ed033's Note - You mean Wilcock? Yes, I listened to the Aaron McCollum.

Agree0 Disagree0