Conspiracy Talk Archive December 20 2011

 

Use our posting form to send us conpiracy talk.

20 Dec 2011 22:03:40
Was watching a documentary on how supposedly Princess Diana was killed by the security services what is your view on this Eds as you seem to be in the know for most things?

Halewood Red

{Ed033's Note - Several books were written about that it was no accident - Jon King and John Beveridge wrote Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence - books.google.co.uk/books?id=AI0ui3cazTcC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Looking at the available evidence, I don't think it was an accident. For example we have:
1. All the cameras near the tunnel switched off
2. The mercedes used had been stolen at gun point earlier and then abandoned a while later (possibly to add devices)
3. The strange route to the tunnel which was the opposite direction
4. The bodyguard that survived told to keep quiet afterwards
5. The Henri Paul "drunk driver" false accusation
6. The ritual date change and ritual place of the crash
7. The quick clean up of the crime scene after the crash
8. Allegedly no one knows who the ambulance people are who took Diana to the hospital
9. The ambulance bypassed the first hospital and went to the second hospital further away
10. The ambulance took about 40 minutes to arrive at the second hospital but the journey should have taken 10 minutes
11. Diana was allegedly just seen with an injured arm and was walking about after the crash

Chris Everard produced a documentary about this called Lady Die

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Well the Media killed her that night. They forced the driver into taking more risks that he would have.

The driver may of been drunk too.

Its 2000', people dont care if a di was prego with a muslim b**tard child {Ed001's Note - actually there is a lot of doubt about the driver's drunken state, nothing about his driving supports that 'find'. In fact numerous tests tried out since then have shown that even hardened drinkers struggled to stand up, let alone walk naturally to a car and drive it, with the amount he was said to have drunk. I remember waking up in the night when it happened, the initial on-the-spot radio report, from a reporter who said they were at the scene reporting it, said that Di was put into the ambulance conscious. I have always wished I had taken notice of the name of the reporter etc so I could find out if they really were there.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Iv drove home drunk, not stupid drunk, but had enough to take a few more risks than i should have eg speed up to pass the lights. with a chasing pack im sure he made a mistake, was driving a little bit too fast and clipped side of the tunel then lost control.

Its logical. {Ed001's Note - not with the amount of alcohol said to be in his system you wouldn't.}

Agree0 Disagree0

I saw the whole thing happen live on sky news. The reporters where chasing the car.

They where on the scene in seconds and watched di die in front of them. All the time taking pictures instead of helping.

So really who is really to blame. The reporters or a drunk driver or was it a sniper who shot out one of tyers.lol {Ed001's Note - you saw it happen live on Sky News? Strange that, it wasn't live on Sky News. The reports were only coming through after the event happened. Even their initial reports from 3:24am UK time said that she had concussion and a broken arm but was alive.}

Agree0 Disagree0

The official cover story/disinformation is that the paparazzi were to blame.

Agree0 Disagree0

It's odd as I remember coming in from a night out and being told by the taxi driver, but at the time clubs near me shut at around 2am so can't have been much later than 3am yet time lines say's different. It's a conspiracy I tells ya!

Agree0 Disagree0

6. The ritual date change and ritual place of the crash

Sorry but what do you mean?

{Ed033's Note - Diana was allegedly ritually sacrificed on a ritual date and place. Pont de l'Alma in Paris where the crash took place is an ancient sacrificial site, used for the worship of the Roman Goddess, Diana. It's also allegedly a place where the european royalty went if they had an argument with each other and they would settle matters there. Diana was allegedly upsetting multiple people in "high places" for several reasons so they allegedly hatched their ritual at this location.

13 is a sacred number of Goddess Diana worship. The Mercedes car allegedly struck the 13th pillar of the tunnel. Goddess Diana was traditionally worshipped on August 13th. However in their ritual numerology if you reverse the number it would essentially mean the opposite, so if you don't want to worship diana but want to ritually sacrifice you would reverse 13 and would get 31. So August 31st would be the obvious ritual date. Princess Diana allegedly wanted to return to UK before August 31st but was allegedly told that this was impossible by the people around her. The crash happened on August 31st.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ah ok thanks for clearing that up.

Might be something in it, might be a stratch.

Any other ritual bumppings off?

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2011 18:24:57
I've just read that Dutch scientists claim to have developed a deadly strain of bird flu. The mutation means the virus can transmitted through the air......WHY??

Presumably this will be unleashed on the public in the nexy year or two and actually achieve the death count that swine flu was supposed to??

Paragon

Believable1 Unbelievable0

Why do people do that, then it gets out. im still recoving from swing flu

Agree0 Disagree0

It's a good point, why develop a deadly strain of bird flu? Unless to release it

Agree0 Disagree0

In order to create the drugs that can counteract the deadly form. You CANNOT build a vacine or cure without first cultuing the virus. I'm sure someone will tell me that this is a lie put about by the illuminate etc but it really isn't.

Agree1 Disagree1

No you'd take the original bird flu and develop stuff from that not create a weaponised version of the original bird flu as you have just changed the original bird flu.

Agree1 Disagree0

According to the scientists reasoning, modifying the virus into a much deadlier strain will enable them / big pharma to create new vaccines.

However, they go on to say bird flu in its current form does not transmit that well, nowhere near level of other flu strains but, 60% of people that have bird flu die. They also pointed out that their modified virus "could" occur naturally....You think?

So what i can't wrap my tiny little mind around is that if bird flu is already deadly in its current form, why change its potency (in terms of being able to distribute and contract the virus) to create new vaccines?

As usual the yanks are involved; saying the findings shouldn't be published because terrorists will get hold of it and use it against us, but of course they expect to be fully briefed and most likely obtain a sample for their own development!?

Whether it be a pandemic or new largely untested vaccines being pumped into our young and old (i guess the middle group is a good demographic and emerging market!) this sounds really snakey to me.

Paragon

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2011 16:47:34
Kepler22, anyone else see this as a blatant smokescreen from NASA. Tell us the truth about the moon and mars!! Really winds me up, they feed you little suggestive hints on a drip that there could possibly be life in other places, when its blatantley obvious the whole universe is absoloutley teaming with life. Strikes me as a 'Kepler 22 will keep them off our backs for a while' sort of thing. Any thoughts?

LIAM

Believable2 Unbelievable0

Ye i know where your coming from it's like a very slow drip feed to get us used to the possibility of life on other planets one of the Eds posted a good documentary about the moon the other day it's well worth a watch

MJ

Agree1 Disagree0

Most people don't want to know the truth.to caught up in their own rubbish lives to think about anything else.but pages like this and many others help to change peoples opinions and thoughts.ignorance is bliss.all the info on the moon is available to anyone who wants to know but it seems like a minority.we should all know things like this but are never told....why....

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed033's Note - Here is the moon documentary mentioned above - Moon Rising - (Full Disclosure Version) by Jose Escamilla

Agree0 Disagree0

They feed people that line to get populaity amoung nut jobs like yourselves.

Then they hit the goverment up for more money as NASA becomes a hot talking point.

ITs a game NASA play for money, They consume billions in tax dolla.

Also NASA have invented some great things. I wonder why their invenions never cove their outgoing?

Prob because they bill the goverment $50 dollas for a $3 hammer.

Agree0 Disagree2

Eh?? your point doesnt make sense. They have got no popularity amongst people like me, hence the nature of the post. Plus your using a hammer analagy in a post about space and kepler22 haha. The evidence is that strong that NASA is hiding information, that its not up to conspirisists to prove they are lying, its up to the people like you to prove that they are NOT lying. Can you?? Give it 5 years and every major government will have no choice but to admit that E.T's exist and we have known for a very long time,

LIAM

Agree0 Disagree0

Liam although the above poster is obviously abit simple certain USA sections such as NASA has over charged for items by a massive amount such as Hammers etc ( he has taken this quote from a film)... Also how are we nutjobs because we choose to believe 1. Our Governments are super corrupt 2. We believe in life in other parts of the universe, Ghosts, and other unknowns, 3. Your that pathetic you judge people without the courage to sign your post 4. There has been many many little snipets about new planets similar to earth in papers over the years but they are given the smallest column size in the paper which sub consciously you skip but keep dreaming anonymous keyboard warrior you'll make sense one day

MJ

Agree0 Disagree0

I believe the quote is from Independence Day after they adrrive at area 51, its Jeff Goldblum's characters father in repsonse to someone else asking how do they get funding for a place like that.

PRESIDENT
I don't understand. Where did all
this come from? How did this get
funded?

MOISHE
You didn't think they actually
spent ten thousand dollars for a
hammer and thirty thousand for a
toilet seat, did you?

Sorry if the layout goes crewy copied it from imdb.

Anyway they do have some shady funding this is why no-one trusts them.

Mort.

{Ed033's Note - Yes, if you "invoice" the government for a hammer and charge $50 for a $3 hammer, $47 can go into black projects.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Indeed, they must go through a lot of hammers ;P Mort

{Ed033's Note - On September 10th 2001 Donald Rumsfeld came forward and said $2.3 trillion had gone missing from government funds.}

Agree0 Disagree0

And his dept would be one of the main ones for financing as well i'm guessing?

And then the next day such news gets buried....

Mort. {Ed033's Note - exactly.}

Agree0 Disagree0

20 Dec 2011 02:40:41
This isnt really a conspiracy more a thought but I will put it to yous anyway. Well I think that religon kinda contradicts its self because if u think about earile man b4 jesuse if he even was real. What did they beleve b4 him sureley there must have been sumthing? And what about when man started off in africa (if it did lol) how did man travel all round the world n populate mother earth and create so many faiths from the same starting population. I just cant get my head round it to be honest. Can any one explane how this happend or is religion just a lode of bull. Im a non belever by the way. And dont slag the spelling a no im crap at it lol

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Christianity grew out of Judaism (as did Islam) prior to those there were multi god religions like the greeks, romans, egyptians, norse gods etc. Most peoples through the years have turned to a god or gods as a way to explain things that were too big for their minds or the current thinking of the time.

Agree1 Disagree1

Earth was one supercontinent before breaking up was it not? therefore,people are all over the shop.

Agree0 Disagree0

If you check out ancient Sumeria and their gods, that's where EVERY religion got its story. Doesn't mean that's the true story either, but it's the first recorded history/myth/legend from a very advanced civilisation.

Peace

Jay
Glasgow

Agree0 Disagree0

Its a bit like chinese whispers, all modern religions originate form the same thing but over the years have seperated and changed slightly as theyve spreaded, there is a video showing this, to do with the stars and planets, maybe the ed or someone has a link?

LIAM

Agree0 Disagree0

Religion should be more about spirituality instead of worshipping an idol thats the problem someone comes up with a God figure and it grows and grows until a group of idiots believe their god is greater and Holy wars start Religion is Pathetic if you idol worship

MJ

Agree0 Disagree0

There is no god... time, gravity, engery and space were created by the big bang... and when people say he could of created the big bang...well no, because he wouldn't of had any time to create the big bang as it didn't exist...

Agree0 Disagree4

What could possibly go BANG if NOTHING was present?

Now assume NOTHING blew up, could order have come from the chaos of NOTHING blowing up?. Capitals are an extra.

Agree2 Disagree0

Time was not created by the big bang, it was invented by man. Seconds, minutes, hours et al.

{Ed033's Note - "the big bang" was also invented by man. It's just a theory.}

Agree0 Disagree0

A god is something desperate people have looked to when all else has failed and all hope has gone.a last resort.

Agree0 Disagree3

I think man invented man also......................is there anybody out there?

Agree0 Disagree0