Conspiracy Talk Archive December 22 2011

 

Use our posting form to send us conpiracy talk.

22 Dec 2011 23:34:52
Orite eds, im relatively new to the sight and am finding the theory of black technology extremely interesting. I was just wondering if you see the majority of black technology as discovered on earth or coming from ET's. Any response would be really helpful, cheers HAZZA {Ed001's Note - personally I believe it is just highly developed terrestial technology. For instance the US was unable to make a flying wing-type plane work when they tried it in the aftermath of WW2, yet the Nazis had perfected them before the war even started and were developing them for use during. I just think there are many things discovered by some genius or other and bought off them and locked away from view.}

Believable0 Unbelievable2

Breaking news:Do not use the word "black", Alan hansen,john terry and our number 7 have all seen the outcome.Just a warning.Redupnorth

Agree2 Disagree0

You can say the word BLACK you cant use the word coloured when refering to dark skinned people

{Ed033's Note - If we forget about the word majority and just say some of the black technology allegedly came from ETs.

I am unsure about the Colonel Philip J. Corso info and his book, The Day After Roswell but Philip J. Corso talks about us getting ET technology from the Roswell crash in his book:

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Dec 2011 19:55:56
dont know if this is the right forum to make my point, but here it goes,luie surez situation, iadmit i am a biased red and untill we hear the full facts of liverpools defence i will back luie, the thing which is really bugging me alan hansen used the word coulred instead of black and every one is up in arms about it, hansan apoligises, headcams for stewards for a football game spurs v chelsea were is this gonna all end?, big brother/judge dredd.
frankyscouse

Believable3 Unbelievable1

Im still annoyed about this. There is no evidence. It was used in a differnet context

Irish Red

Agree3 Disagree1

The thing is if surez was devious he could have said no i never said anything as he knew there was no pics/video or mic that picked anything up, but instead he chose to say he said the word(culture difference)so he thought he should be honest,then you have evra whos previous accusations with the chelsea steward got thrown out for exageration,then you have evra saying surez said the word ten times,question is who do you think is the liar?
frankyscouse {Ed001's Note - Evra never accused the Chelsea steward, it was Mickey Phelan who accused the Chelsea steward, Evra said he never heard anything.}

Agree3 Disagree1

BUt it still doesn't make sense. Suarez isnt white himself so its evra liying again in my opinion

Irish Red

Agree4 Disagree2

Didnt Evra start the Anlka revolt at the worldcup. He is just a trouble maker.

Even Fergi didnt want to endorse Evra version of the "so called truth"

Im calling Evra a drama Queen fairy

Agree6 Disagree3

What makes it more disgusting about the fa and hypercritical is when blatter comes out every year with hes stupid statements including racisim, they never have the bottle to front him, as for all this where does this end? hansan cant say the word coulored,which was my main point not about louie,ok edd i take your point about phelen, funny how when something happens to a man u pl.ayer i ment evra it makes the news eh?.
frankyscouse

Agree1 Disagree1

I just don't understand why that prat Terry hasn't been banned from football. Everybody saw Terrys racial slur yet its being dragged on and on and on. He should NOT have been playing yesterday night against Tottenham. Suarez ban was harsh, its his word against the trouble maker evra. There was always going to be one winner and thats utd.....i mean Evra.

Azza

{Ed033's Note - Yes but John Terry is such a gentleman (lol), that's probably why the ladies love him so much.}

Agree1 Disagree1

Evra is clearly lying. Suarez is not exactly white ( no racism ) himself so Evra has to be lying about which context it was in.

Irish Red

Agree3 Disagree1

Yeh edd hes a right charmer lol
frankyscouse

Agree1 Disagree1

Firstly Surez admitted to what he said so not exactly the smartest thing to do.

Secondly you as a club are making yourselves look silly with your t shirts and daft press releases.

Thirdly as ed001 (a liverpool fan) pointed out it was Mike Phelan who complained at Chelsea not Evra.

Fourthly the world cup thing, yes Evra led it he was captain. Not saying it was right or wrong but the players clearly didn't rate the manager, we've seen similar things before..

Also you if you want to talk about FA conspiracies how aout Rooney's ban and the Rio drug test?

End of day just accept what Suarez said was wrong and move on. Lets face it he'll be running for Spain in the summer where they have a much more relaxed attitude to such things. {Ed001's Note - have you forgotten that Evra also admitted to saying something far worse, a serious racial slur was used by Evra before anything was said by Suarez. I think the FA are a joke, they clearly just wanted to prove a point to Blatter but they should have punished both players or neither.}

Agree0 Disagree1

O and Terry should have the book thrown at him, 8 game ban as a minimum as thats now the precedent, more likely 12 at least. Fined 3 months wages, and stripped of the England and Chelsea captaincies and a 15 game England ban.

Agree1 Disagree1

Ed i'm not defending Evra at all. I think really people need to wait for the official report. I just think things have gotten silly and as a club your not doing yourselves any favours, your looking silly in front of everyone else. I know every club has them but the lunatic fringe really are embarrassing. And the t shirts thing was very silly. {Ed001's Note - how is the club not doing themselves any favours? The newspapers have stirred up a frenzy of lies with their talk of Suarez being racist, despite both the FA and Evra stating that he is not. But still he is being punished for using a word that is a term of endearment, while a man that admits using a serious racial slur to goad him gets no punishment whatsoever. I think Liverpool have every right to feel hard done by and fight their corner. It is embarrassing that so many ill-informed people are coming out with nonsense that they have read in tabloids to abuse Liverpool for their stance. When you have Paul McGrath, who once called Ron Atkinson 'an inspiration to black footballers' after he was sacked by ITV for his comments about Marcel Desailly, trying to jump in to have a go at Suarez, you know the whole situation has descended into farce.}

Agree1 Disagree0

I believe in karma and evra will get it bk tenfold.
frankyscouse

Agree2 Disagree0

Term of endearment?? it might be back in urguay ed but it certainly wasn't interpreted as one, also i don't believe thats how he used it either. {Ed001's Note - the point is that it is one, it is only the equivalent of saying dear in a patronising way, unlike the highly offensive term Evra used to refer to Suarez. You will find the suffix ito is also used in Spain as a term of endearment, it literally translates as little, but it is used more like dear. As in it is added to the end of a word or name to refer to someone, which is why Evra's own team mates refer to him using the exact same word.}

Agree0 Disagree0

I have seen the Terry video and he can be clearly seen sayin derogatory racial terms. i aint no professional lip reader but its as clear as day. This is highly embarassing for the FA having their captain being charged with racism and this is the only reason why suarez has had the book thrown at him, to shift the focus off terry and to show the world that england do not tolerate racism.

Terry will be charged and banned but I think the FA and terrys advisers and lawyers are hoping to stretch out the court proceedings beyond euro2012. There is no way england can go into that tournament with a convicted racist on having captained them throughout the qualifiers and this is why his situation is being dragged out. Trust me if you have seen the video you will know there is no doubt terry will be charged eventually. His career is over and he knows it.

j

Agree2 Disagree0

The media are deffo drumming this up in to something of a witchunt,we have not heard liverpools responce when they do appeal, but you get the daily mirror slandering racist and you get talk sport adrian durham spouting off that because the fa board found surez guilty he is bangs to rights,then u get talkspot all day yesterday getting a one eyed veiw, they even dug up paul man u mgrath on hes opinon, honestly whats he gonna say?you even had 1 stoke fan saying surez should be kicked out the country and the fa should make liverpool sell him, comming from a caveman club who had a feller nearly end another players career.
frankyscouse

Agree1 Disagree0

He is banned 4 agrivated behavour,not racisim. {Ed001's Note - no, he was banned for misconduct: http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplinary/NewsAndFeatures/2011/luis-suarez-20-12-11 .}

Agree0 Disagree1

Ed i really don't think he meant to use it in this context as a term of endearment. why would he?

{Ed033's Note - Did Luis Suarez have the mens rea? That is the question.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Here is a link that shows you how pathetic paul mcgrath is for judging surez before the full facts come out.

www.anfieldroad.com/news/lfc/2011-12-24/5560/t-shirts-shameful-yet-undisputed-racism-is-a-laughing-matter.html/

frankyscouse

Agree0 Disagree0

Why should Saurez get banned for 8 games with a word that means pal and Evra gets awat with abusing all South Americans ?

Irish Red

Agree2 Disagree0

You scousers are a joke. So a Pakistani man cannot make a racist comment to a Jamaican man, coz neither are white? Grow up - in the heat of the moment Suarez made a racist comment to Evra that he admitted making. It doesnt make him a racist, but the comment was racist and he's being punished appropriately.

RED_SKY

Agree0 Disagree2

To the guy that said "O and Terry should have the book thrown at him" above you are a bloody person and need tae go stick yer heed in a kettle. Who the f*** do u think u are wanting to give out that kind of punishment? U'l be another sheeple who lets the press f*** ur mind. Am no a chelsea or liverpool fan, a dont support any team in england so im not biased. However even ian wright said "suarez's ban means any black player with a grudge can claim to have been racially abused". Where does this leave white people in our own country? We're not gona report someone calling us milky or pale or suhin :S. Freedom of speech!

Agree1 Disagree0

I do think its going over the top, hansa cant now say the word colured without having to apoligize, as for terry and surez its like chalk and chesse(chalk not a pun for me being white)terry has got plenty of prevouis from 9/11 gags to bridge to taking backhanders for tours around chelsea to playing away(pardon d pun again) in other words if he wernt a footballer he would be prob doing time now,as for u red sky your analogy about two different cultures calling out a word that the other culture did not like, means evra should get exactly the same ban as evra as he called surez a insult in spanish about were he was born.
frankyscouse

Agree0 Disagree0

A word that means pal? Its literally little blackie? How is that pal? Go to some neighbourhoods in this country and call the inhabitants little blackie and count your teeth when you wake up mate. {Ed001's Note - it's not little blackie, it's little black man, but the literal translation is not the correct translation, as Evra would know being a fluent Spanish speaker. The suffix ito literally translates as little, but is used as a term of endearment similar to the English use of the word dear.}

Agree0 Disagree0

I said Terry should have the book thrown at him and i stand by it, what he did was totally unacceptable, so follow your own advice and shove your head in the kettle. Terry is a scumbag and its not the first time he has been in trouble and i for one do not want the despicable toad wearing my countries shirt.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed its a matter of interpretation and i know plenty of guys who would have interpreted as i just said it and most definitely would not have taken its as something like dear.

I seriously do not think he was joking at Evra, 2 guys playing in the biggest rivalry in English football? it was meant as an insult.

Ok it was heat of the moment, he knows he was wrong wihich is why he's come out with all this culture rubbish. Just accept he did wrong and take the punishment. {Ed001's Note - it is not a matter of interpretation at all, to a fluent Spanish speaker it is always the same interpretation. The thing you seem to be forgetting is that it is irrelevant when Evra has admitted using a serious racial slur to insult Suarez prior to it, he should have been facing the same punishment at the very least. Seems to me you should stop reading tabloids and getting your info from them.}

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't read tabloids. {Ed001's Note - you are repeating the same nonsense they did.....}

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Dec 2011 20:49:04
I was around queens drive Prescott road the other week and I saw loads of graffiti saying stuff like " Reject The NWO" and saying GM foods = Cancer stuff along those lines anyway but it was on everyone of those green box's for about a mile it was crazy, looks like people may be starting to wake up with what's going on

Halewood Red

Believable5 Unbelievable0

22 Dec 2011 18:15:35
just a oberservation,wife comes home after shopping for a few bits for xmas period, most of the stuff on shelves gone, bread,ice cream, etc etc , it was bare in teco /asda etc, my point is some feller said it would only take all the satellite,s down , then all the electronis ie, banks/credidt cards/shopps/petrol pumps would be down, if we panic buy shopping for 1 day(xmas day) after three days this guy said there would be mass looting if the satillites went down, after a week there would be killing for food,same thing happend in the usa when they could not get water or could not be botherd to when hurricain katrina happend , makes you think eh?
frankyscouse

{Ed033's Note - This is the very reason why we need to create our own electricity locally as in each street or each house. The technology is out there for us to create electricity locally at a super cheap price but we're not allowed that technology.}

Believable2 Unbelievable0

The poster was spot on! Works colleague was shopping today and the major supermarket he was in was in meltdown!
everything gone.. I took the old lady to a well know German low budget chain and most of the stock had gone too, even the obscure fruit and veg they sell. My point " the shops will only be closed for one day", what would happen if we had a major incident or disruption to the food chain. My guess would be absolute fight for survivalist type of violence!!
Bep Kororoti

Agree2 Disagree0

Agreed bep, this might sound a bit dramatic but i think its wise to store a few bits(i dont mean post nucular bomb scenario) i just mean maybe a load of tins and a few bits to last a week or 2, next year we are getting our xmas food stuff in november, two reasons /more stock/cheaper. and one day it will happen that there will be a shortage of food supplies from petrol strike or prices to a virus that will wipe out all satalittes.
frankyscouse

{Ed033's Note - It's good to have spare food but if the worst case scenario does take place, when family, friends, neighbours come knocking to see if you have any spare food, if you give it away to them as you should then it doesn't matter how much spare food you have it will be gone very quickly.

However, in countries where a lesser than worst case scenario has taken place, those with spare food did a lot better than those that didn't and the more spare food the better. But if you buy food that needs to be cooked you require a way of cooking it if the electricity/gas is cut off.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Plenty of tins edd with a camping stove,yeh i see your point abot famaily and freinds, its just when you mention to stock a few things away they laugh or take the p-- or give you a funny look, i would have done exactly the same 10 years ago thou , its just i have awoken.
frankyscouse
{Ed033's Note - yes, it's a nuisance that more people haven't woken up. I think it's because they're still "comfortable". In addition, we have heard that a large coronal mass ejection can not only wipe out the electrical grid but can also render car electrics useless as well. So hardly anyone can go anywhere a distance away.}

Agree1 Disagree0

Back to the 18 hundreads were horses were transport,it might make us grow are own stuff again, which might not be a bad thing.
frankyscouse

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Dec 2011 12:08:01
ed- do you think we will perfect space travel or at least publicly announce any missions to another planet/moon in the next 50 years?

{Ed033's Note - This may depend on whether we have now stopped the carbon tax nonsense. If the carbon tax is allowed because people believe in the carbon dioxide causing planetary problems nonsense, then the carbon tax (to cut 80% of carbon dioxide emissions) would put the world back before the industrial revolution.

Michio Kaku talks about us moving from a Type 0 civilisation to a Type 1 civilisation which is obviously the way to go. The secret space program allegedly has the technology to give us so we can start to move towards the Type 1 civilisation but as yet we aren't allowed this technology.

Dr. Michio Kaku in 2009 talking about the World in 2030 and beyond
Dr. Kaku starts speaking at 5:27

Believable1 Unbelievable0

I seen something like this on the discovery channel, same guy aswell, very clever respectable man, he talks about us being so many years away from type 1, 1000(?) years away from type 2 and like 1million years from type 3.

Agree0 Disagree0

Proff charles dodgeson was lewis carol man thats weird
frankyscouse

Agree0 Disagree0

He is a very funny guy as well.
frankyscouse

Agree0 Disagree0

Lewish carrol book threw the looking glass , he can see in the furture ans past.
frankyscouse

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Dec 2011 00:02:56
Thanks for the post's. Apologies for now going to a different subject. But it's very interesting to get feedback on things that I've long thought about.
Several years ago (and I don't remember the source) I heard a theory that the "Royal family" did in the past (or even still do) control the worlds heroin supply. Having heard this a while ago I've come to believe that the US control the worlds cocaine supply controlling south America and often as reported in the past producing profits for the CIA flooding drugs into mainly ghettos also for the purpose of population control. I also believe that because of the heroin cartel rumour, that the British army is in afganistan to either takeover/re-establish or maintain that control of the worlds heroin supply as the country produces something like 85% of the worlds heroin. It makes perfect sense for the amount of time the army have been there and the plans to be there for at least the next decade. I don't understand why else they would be there for that long. This leaves the US growing the share of the oil in the east in Iraq previously Kuwait etc. It's even possible that the Royal Family through the US control pretty much the entire globes supply of drugs.
Any thoughts anyone/ed's?
I haven't read all previous threads recently so apologies if already covered.

{Ed033's Note - I don't think there is any doubt that British soldiers are in Afghanistan to protect the poppy fields

Believable1 Unbelievable0

Drugs in whatver form you want to talk about r used as a mans to dumb down then senses it is just away of controlling the masses esp the poor.and esp the african americans know racism intended.
Thats why Obama got in gives people a belief that any thing is possible even tho we know its not.

Lurgan Red

Agree1 Disagree0

22 Dec 2011 04:55:25
Has anyone here heard anything about the Denver Airport Conspiracy?

Believable4 Unbelievable0

Do u mean the under ground bunkers there?

PAULMONDO

{Ed033's Note - There's a number of stuff going on there including those weird "new world order" type paintings.}

Agree0 Disagree0

22 Dec 2011 02:47:48
Less than a year untill we die lol.. Such a load of crap lol

Irish Red

Believable3 Unbelievable2