Conspiracy Talk Archive November 04 2011

 

Use our posting form to send us conpiracy talk.

04 Nov 2011 22:31:34
the loch ness monster is true

Believable5 Unbelievable1

No it's not

Agree1 Disagree2

Yea so is the easter bunny.

Agree0 Disagree2

And Santa

Agree1 Disagree2

Yous forgot about the tooth ferry and birthday clause but the loch ness monster is true

Agree1 Disagree0

Where does the tooth ferry sail from? hollyhead?

Agree1 Disagree0

04 Nov 2011 19:33:35
I'm just catching up with BBC's Frozen Planet on iplayer and I have to say it's programmes like this that convince me (even more) that there is no god and we aren't descendants of aliens. We just are

Chris in Tamworth

Believable2 Unbelievable4

Chris , could you be wrong , the best way of doing it is look at other points of view , we just did not appear here with the animals and plants and sun and moon all interacting with each other with nothing behind it all , unless its a majic trick or something..............lfc

Agree2 Disagree1

Why would u believe the BBC, they are lieing bast*@ds. Although god, as in bible god, is also a load of s**t.

Agree3 Disagree2

If there is a single god/creator then maybe everything comes from that , but in chris from tamworth words that sounds a bit -i always was - sort of thing lol.............lfc

Agree1 Disagree1

Ok so you are saying that what I watched happening on the Frozen Planet wasn't true because it was on the BBC? Now that is some serious paranoia!

Chris in Tamworth

Agree0 Disagree1

Look through out history people believed the world was plant and if you sailed tp far you would fall off but they were wrong so the bbc could be wrong

Irish Red

Agree0 Disagree0

I propose that Chris in Tamworth is actually our creator and holder of all knowledge and is simply jelous we have not praised him and given him his just due. So here it is Chris or is it really Christ now theres a conspiracy and I'm on to you my friend

Agree1 Disagree0

Was suppose to say' flat and if you sailed to far you would fall off

Irish Red

Agree0 Disagree0

In the immortal words of Penry, the mild mannered janitor... Could be!

Chris in Tamworth

Agree0 Disagree0

The idea of top down evolution poses far more questions than it answers. If god made us then who made god?

Agree0 Disagree0

WELL SAID, WHO THE EFF MADE GOD!

Chris, did you see the ancient aliens programme on on the History Channel? You can watch it on youtube. It is fascinating, it goes around the world to all these clearly constructed things that simply could not have been done by current human civilization, it's amazing, if you haven't seen it I'd recommend it, and if you have, would be good to hear your thoughts.

Raz

Agree2 Disagree0

God was made by Morgan Freeman

Agree3 Disagree1

Is george burns not the orginal , anyway god looks cool smoking a cigar , i think anyway ,lol...........lfc

Agree1 Disagree0

I can prove conclusively that Chris in Tamworth and God are NOT one and the same being. Proof ?

1) God is infallible
2) Have you read Chris' views on rugby league as opposed to that schollboy game?

Puzzled

Agree1 Disagree0

04 Nov 2011 15:34:51
The July 7, 2005 Tube bombings - One of the supposed mysteries surrounding the 7/7 attacks is this image, used by several news outlets, of the bombers entering Luton station on their way to London at around 7.20am on July 7. Theorists claim this image is fake because the man in the white hat - believed to be Mohammed Sidique Khan - has been electronically placed on the picture after it was taken. They claim that it shows his arm behind a railing while the rest of his body is in front and that the bar behind his head goes across and in front of his face. Theorists postulate, among other things, that the bombs which went off on the Tube trains were actually under the floors of the vehicles and not in the alleged plotters' back packs. Google the picture guys !!
greenbloodredsoul

{Ed033's Note - That's right. This picture was faked - www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xrd1vq4QozA

These 4 guys were probably taking part in a government agency exercise run by Peter Powers' company just as the 7/7 Ripple Effect film alleges - . These 4 guys had come into London previously on a dummy run. This is where the extra footage of them in London was from that was shown to the public when people started asking questions. Nick Kollerstrom went to the 7/7 inquest and basically says it was a farce.

The 7/7 Ripple Effect Film - www.jforjustice.co.uk/77/

Nick Kollerstrom talking about the 7/7 inquest - www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=55&part=1

Believable1 Unbelievable1

7/7 is so similar to 9/11 it is unbelievable. Clearly an inside job but the lie is big enough, the sheeple swallow what they're told hook, line and sinker.

Paragon

Agree2 Disagree2

Try this

video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4943675105275097719#

Paragon

Agree0 Disagree1

I find it astonishing that on the same day of the london bombings a training exercise was taking place using exactly the same scenario as what occurred.

Whats even more mindblowing is that on september 11th a training exercise was also happening replicating exactly the same scenario that occurred...there are no coincidences in life, only purpose.

Ed who are the risk management company that carried out the exercise on the day of the london bombings and surely they should divulge the details of who ordered the exercise to be done?

Leo Idaho {Ed033's Note - Yes, the company was Visor Consulting - www.visorconsultants.com and the managing director is Peter Power who immediately after the event possibly became scared and thought it would be a good idea to tell all to the british media and made it onto TV and BBC Radio 5 - www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKvkhe3rqtc

Afterwards, "We Are Change" went up to him and it is obvious he has been told to shut up - www.youtube.com/watch?v=29tzNXKUL-Q

Agree1 Disagree2

04 Nov 2011 15:31:17
Fluoridation - Fluoride is commonly added to drinking water as a way to reduce tooth decay. However, there has been some evidence that there could be some harmful side effects from fluoride and conspiracy theorists believe that this information is known and recognised by those responsible for adding the fluoride, but that they continue the practice regardless. Drug companies have been targeted as possible beneficiaries, as they will profit from a population with ill-health. Another motive is that fluoride lowers mental abilities thereby "dumbing down" the entire population.what ye guys think?

{Ed033's Note - Fluoride was used in the german and russian war camps to subdue the prisoners. Fluoride will allegedly cake-up the pineal gland in the brain. Fluoride allows aluminium to pass into the brain through the blood-brain barrier which can cause Alzheimer's disease.

Originally the aluminium industry had an expensive hard time getting rid of the fluoride they used in the making of aluminium as this fluoride is a health risk to humans. Allegedly, there is no evidence that drinking fluoridated water is good for the teeth. Now the aluminium industry sells the fluoride and this is possibly poisonous to humans. If a child swallows toothpaste they could die because of the fluoride in the toothpaste - www.youtube.com/watch?v=xP7IPDfC3yg

Believable0 Unbelievable0

This is why i drink bottled water

Agree0 Disagree0

This is why i drink bottled meths
JR

Agree1 Disagree0

04 Nov 2011 14:06:04
anyone have any opinion on the anonymous movement ?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Who is it?

Agree0 Disagree0

Anonymous Movement is a group, spread through the Internet, initiating active civil disobedience, while attempting to maintain anonymity. Originating in 2003 on the imageboard 4chan, the term refers to the concept of many online community users simultaneously existing as an anarchic, chaotic, global brain. It is also generally considered to be a blanket term for members of certain Internet subcultures, a way to refer to the actions of people in an environment where their actual identities are not known.

Agree0 Disagree0

Would people say they are in favour or against the movement ? i personally am but i am quite curious about everyone else .. {Ed033's Note - As long as they are on the people's side, I am in favour of them.}

Agree2 Disagree0

They say they are on people side but they attacked psn and took valuable information about people so im against them rat bags

Irish Red {Ed001's Note - they have not used the info they took to steal money or anything though, so I fail to see why that is a bad thing? PSN was antiquated, they just stopped a thief doing the same thing but actually using the details to make millions.}

Agree0 Disagree1

Even though the hacking of psn was a nuisance (sony were found lacking though)
,to hack the CIA call centre and then bring down the security firm hired to catch them
was amusing. I am not that sure that the same
group was responsible for the CIA and SONY
anyway. Good on them anyway .
JR

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Nov 2011 11:42:32
Ok here's a conspiracy:

Why is that every time a human being is born with such genetic mutation that they are not technically human, they are simply siad to have a certain condition and that is that?

Sorry but surely there has to be a point where you say 'you know what, this person is lacking the typical number of human chromosomes, their DNA code is wrong, etc etc, maybe they aren't actually human?'

Why is there is nothing on the planet like us? How is it that if apes and monkeys are a different species due to their genetic make-up, then how come a baby born with red eyes and scaly skin is not 'inhuman' - it is simply given a syndrome name and we all move on?

I find that VERY weird. The slightest genetic differences determine new species (just look at the world of insects for example!) so why do humans refuse to say 'actually this person/baby is technically not human'?? I think we need to man up and admit it. Of course society is as much a part of this - what could be accepted in the public eye? And what parent would be happy for their newborn to be labelled inhuman? - but even so, to me this is as much a conspiracy as anything else out there haha.

Now this is not the most serious topic s bare that in mind.

Raz

Believable2 Unbelievable1

Raz , did you know a new born baby loses 50 per cent of its brain cells ,simply because of the air we breath , maybe nasa are right , that thousands of years ago the air was purer , would explain why aminals people and plants were so much bigger at the start of recored history...........lfc

Agree0 Disagree0

If we humans have been genetically tweaked multiple times as suggested what Raz said originally would make sense

Agree1 Disagree0

There is no , repeat no new imformation ever added to genes through time , only a lost of imformation , think of the oringal two humans , then think of a photo-copyier - as each copy of the oringal is made, it becomes sightly less than the oringal , hence you get mistakes , disformaities etc , indeed even a virus becomes resitenant to modern medicines through loss of imformation , not adding any , now we can see we are, if anything just a far weaker copy of the oringal , but who made the oringal or upgraded a more primative man , now thats why we are all looking into the old texts, books, legends..............lfc

Agree1 Disagree0

RAZ have you just had a toke then watched
X-MEN First class ?
JR

Agree2 Disagree0

Haha no, why?! Raz

Agree0 Disagree0

You know , genetic mutations, the next stage
of evolution , blah blah blah .Anyway the new
x-men film came out on dvd this week and i
thougt it might have put you on this train of
thougt .
Cheers JR
ps or you could just be a space cadet

Agree1 Disagree0

Haha no I was watching some youtube vids (previously of tv progs) of babies being born with red eyes, scales, etc etc, and gene mutation....yet we still call it human. To me, if something isn't genetically 'human', why do we not say 'ok this is a such and such' - instead we say 'ohhhh, it's fine, they're just a human born with devil eyes and scales and we'll this XXXX Syndrome' - it's ridiculous!
Raz

Agree0 Disagree0

I have red eyes and scaley skin , and frankly
Raz i feel offended . Alcoholism is a disease man.
JR

Agree0 Disagree0