Conspiracy Talk Archive October 07 2013

 

Use our posting form to send us conpiracy talk.

07 Oct 2013 15:59:17
I seen further down the page someone mentioning Walt Disney and Disney in general. This is actually something I have done a fair amount of reading into since I started reading and editing the sites. Here are some links that people might find interesting reads.

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/the_disney_bloodlinept1.htm

http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Disney/Perverts.html

http://theconspiracyzone.podcastpeople.com/posts/32979

This is only scratching the surface but one thing that I have noticed recently is the graphics that have been released on the internet for the upcoming Star Wars films. If you google 'Star Wars Episode 7 Legacy of the Empire' you will see a poster (I don't know who made it or where it came from, sorry) that looks very 'Disney' in it's appearance, the buildings in the skyline are phallic in appearance, a well documented trait of Disney and their films.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

I've just googled your last bit, thanks ed, looks like you looking at the disney castle but a darker version.
I took my kids to orlando this summer, did the "star tours" ride at disney and it's now somehow developed a Pyramid logo.

Supasub

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - I checked after my post (just to make sure I wasn't imagining it lol) and it is from the cover of the Little Mermaid but there are loads of them in their films. I think it is a good starting point for people reading into the Illuminati and such things. The 'celebrity' factor is enough to hold your attention and it will lead you into some very interesting topics. There is also a door in Disneyland that has a mysterious '33' above it. I have read reports of kids going missing there and being found dressed as the opposite sex, had their hair cuts etc etc. There is definitely something sinister going on there, of that I have no doubt.}

Do you think the 33 is a reference to a level of freemasonry ed? Just the first thing I thought of.
That little mermaid poster you mention has an unmistakable picture in the middle of the golden disney castle that could not have got there by mistake by any stretch of the imagination.

Supasub

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - No - Freemasons were not ones to advertise. There is nothing sinister at all.}

That poster was made by a fan of star wars 2 websites I seen it on confirmed that. This ain't me shooting down the whole Disney conspiracy just the poster bit

Agree0 Disagree0

If you get a mo killah, have a look at the middle of the gold disney castle on the little mermaid poster.
It can't be there by mistake. Just 1 of quite a few plants imo.

Supasub

Agree1 Disagree0

Here is a short 10 minute clip dealing with Disney's subliminal messages

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5ubZ_QNn1Y

Agree0 Disagree0

@Killah that is an observation - not an explanation. pea

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Oct 2013 23:21:54
Buildings in star wars have always been phallic nothing to do with Disney although they'll slip a few things in.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed 2 I have read about the 33 corporate backers behind Disney which included Coca Cola and Pepsi which is unusual as two bitter rivals in the same bed, would be as if Visa and MasterCard were to jointly sponsor the World Cup?

Jonty

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Firstly they are simply sponsors, not "backers". Both were in for a piece of the action back in the mid 60s and were supplying products, possibly free of charge, in order to get some advertising return. You are trying to read something in to this that simply is not there. America in the 50s and for much of the 60s was a very different place than it is now. Disney was picking away at creating an adventure playground where parents could take their pony-tailed girls and flat-topped boys on weekends and holidays. Then there was Nam.}

Ed 2 you make a fair point. My research albeit not too deep states that these where corporate backers not sponsors and did invest in Disney as early as the 50's

Jonty

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - There was a tie to the World's Fair in NYC in (I think) 1965. Regardless, the businesses are not meeting at Disneyland to plot the downfall of Republican Party.}

Number 3 means new. 33 or twice new is read as 2 3. Number 2 means illusion. So it actually says "illusion of new". Keep tumbling down the rabbit hole.
Zari

Agree0 Disagree0

^Mistake there, should of wrote:
Number 2 means means duality.
Zari

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Oct 2013 15:42:05
http://youtu.be/rhWqfPeerbo

A very didsturbing video of George bush at the school on the day of 9/11

What does everybody think of this?

Much appreciated

Aron

Believable4 Unbelievable0

Aron I only saw this a few weeks ago for the first time, and if it's real (and I'm not suggesting it isn't) then it's very damning indeed.

Ryan.

Agree2 Disagree0

Yeah me to guys seen this a few weeks ago, I can not give a rational answer to the clip, coincidence/sick joke?have not got a clue.

Agree1 Disagree1

I have to admit to being a little suspicious that it's only surfaced recently. It's possible that it could be fake. I just don't know to be honest.

Ryan.

Agree2 Disagree0

I saw that quite a while ago. It was also on a documentary from the BBC about what the preswident was doing on the day of the attacks.

If its on the BBC it must be true

Geordie Al

Agree0 Disagree0

If its on the BBC it must be true - classic Al:)

I'm beginning to think it might be real but the words the kids are reciting are

kite
hit
steel
playing (sounds like?)
must

Bush looks uncomfortable. Wonder why?

Ryan.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Oct 2013 10:46:08
RT interview which includes the FBI/CIA were at Michael Hastings' house the day before he died
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EysdTBx-ShI

I also saw the piers morgan interview with his wife http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtJvEEglvxE

I don't think I have ever seen someone so happy that their husband has died which makes me think that the whole interview is just a huge cover up. what's your opinion ed?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed033's Note - It's strange that his wife thinks it was just a tragic accident, unless she has been threatened or she thinks if she says anything other than it was a tragic accident, they might do something to her.

his wife actually threatened to 'Bring those who murdered him to justice' shortly after the death.

Then a few weeks later, released a statement accepting it as an accident. Very Strange.

Exotiva

Agree2 Disagree0

07 Oct 2013 10:53:24
Done quite a bit of reading on the black knight satellite and I'm still no further on a conclusion. Seen the thermal cover explanation, but with further research it's obv not a thermal cover, especially when you see about its polar orbit and the fact it's been up there before we managed to get out into space, and even NASA admitting (apparently) that they have no clue exactly what it is!
Any other opinions would be very much appreciated!

Peace

Jay
Glasgow

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Welcome bk jay, until today I have never heard of the black night satellite and when I get time I will look in to it and give you my opinion.

Agree0 Disagree0

I have had a look at a few vids on You Tube, it would appear that it has been coming and going since the 60's seems to be a strange one but not enough info out there to make a judgement one thing I am certain is that it's not a blanket that fell from a shuttle which is what NASA is trying to say.

Jonty

Agree1 Disagree0

Thanks for the reply jonyt!
I know, that's one of the worst explanations ever. As you've probably seen, that thing has been out there before we were, so doesn't make sense.
Maybe one day we will know for sure, find it strange that it goes missing for a while then apparently comes back.
Like you said, not really a great deal of info on it. Some good discussions on other sites though!

Peace

Jay
Glasgow

Agree0 Disagree0