18 Feb 2016 18:09:46
Ed what's your take on Cameron trying to get a deal with the EU which nobody is interested in. And if he wins or fails if England or the uk leave the EU surely this would cause an upset for the controllers.

{Ed033's Note - All Cameron is doing is trying to get some concessions from the EU by saying this bull that if he gets these concessions then the British people may be more likely to vote to stay in the EU. But all this is about is Cameron being told to try to con the EU into giving concessions.

If the controllers want UK to stay in the EU, they'll rig the vote, but we already know that in a decade's time and beyond, the controllers will be moving European countries into becoming Islamic states (it's already started if you haven't noticed.)

In 2016 they are going to attempt to bring in 50 million people from Africa (North Africa is already islamic) and people from The Middle East into the EU. The 50 million will be made up of relatives of the people already here and new people coming in and their relatives.

And each year from now on they will be bringing in millions more and they'll be no end to it. How can we afford it and where are they going to live and will it not lead to the ruination of Europe?

Dave Rubin interview: 'Islamification' of Europe and Immigration into Europe


 
18 Feb 2016 22:02:51
Yeah but in my view I think we will leave the eu.


 
19 Feb 2016 15:32:54
P1 I really hope you are rite.


 
20 Feb 2016 09:33:07
Hi ed, had typed out a big reply but it doesn't seem to have sent, anyway,

You've said couple times about Europe becoming an Islamic state and the number of people recently being moved into Europe to make this happen in maybe 10+ years.

How do you see it coming around? Acts passed through parliament? Fighting in the streets until a ceasefire and deal is made?

If it were to happen do you think the areas that become an Islamic state would be governed like a Saudi Arabia/ Qatar or would it be along the lines of an Isis held territory in Iraq/ Syria?

Also you think there would be some sort of amnesty for those who didn't want to live in such conditions to move on to an area where they can believe whatever they want?

Finally why do you think the "ones in charge" have decided that an Islamic state is the best way to go? Provides more control? Or people easily led?

I know it's lots of guess work but quite interesting.

Cheers.

 

{Ed033's Note - Just my opinion but, first of all, we have to go back to the roman empire and realise that the zionists had the eventual aim of taking it over. When the roman empire became 'the church' and 'the church' was running things in Europe, at some point the zionists did take over but i don't know exactly when.

'The church' actually were the ones that took over Islam and used it and still uses it as zionists to get muslims to do their bidding for them (this is why muslims are so useful to the zionists), or at least that is what the zionists want to believe.

zionists have been trying to ruin Europe and genocide europeans for hundreds of years and then some and their religion demands it.
The zionists hate all europeans for at least 2 reasons.
1. they see them as competition

2. Jews have been thrown out of Europe over 100 times because every time they go into any country in Europe, they try to ruin it. The reason why all jews get thrown out is because they don't know which of the jews are the zionists ruining things.

How are the zionists going to turn european countries into islamic states?

One answer is how did the jews takeover Palestine and 'ethnically cleanse'/genocide the indigenous Palestinians

The answer is not, 'They wouldn’t do that'
The answer is not, 'The Jews will become Muslims'
The answer is not, 'The Jews will live like Palestinians'

The answer is that you keep bringing jews into Palestine and accommodate the Jews according to their religion.

They’ll just keep bringing muslims in and accommodate them according to their religion. This will happen through government legislation. This means Pork legislation, Alcohol legislation, Holy Holiday legislation, and bringing in any legislation that benefits muslims to the detriment of europeans, building of Mosques, Bringing in Sharia Law etc.

Any pushback from Europeans will turn muslims into radical muslims, which is the agenda, as only radical muslims will live in a totalitarian state. The ultimate aim of 'the controllers' is total control, something Europeans won't go along with but radical muslims will.

You would expect each country in Europe that has enough muslims/africans in it, to be governed like Saudi Arabia (Wahhabi-zionism).

If, in any of the european countries a big fight breaks out (with ISIS fighters already in Europe), you would expect some type of military action to be brought in who would not be on the side of the Europeans (although the military may not know this as they’ll do as they’re ordered). The military action may be a combination of drone strikes, jet fighter attacks, helicopter gunships, hired mercenaries (blackwater/XE), NATO forces.


 
20 Feb 2016 17:44:00
Thanks for that ed, going to read up on the Zionist element. Really interesting and potentially grim situation. Maybe use it as a reason to convince my wife to pack up and disappear into the wilderness of Alaska 😝.

 

{Ed033's Note - If we already have tens of thousands of people living on the streets of Europe, why don't the governments of Europe help those European people?

The wilderness of Alaska sounds fun.


 
20 Feb 2016 18:47:32
That's what really annoys me with all those adverts for £3 per month or whatever to help someone in some part of Africa or the 3/ 4 times a year the BBC do a fund raiser for Syria or wherever. The state Britain is in that's never really in the news or put out in the mainstream. Through work the conditions I have seen people, adults and children here living in a so called first world country is a disgrace. We should be using all this money from these fundraisers to sort out our own problems before trying to help all the other places.
Just my two cents worth.


 
21 Feb 2016 18:13:50
For any modern country that is in the top economies of the world to have people sleeping on the streets is a disgrace. True socialism is the war on poverty. Something forgotten by modern "socialists"


 
21 Feb 2016 21:34:39
The CPS are already working with sharia courts and letting them deal with cases of domestic violence outside of the CPS . So that tells you that this country is perfectly ok with the beating and gang raping of women. Like you say the British idea of been up in arms is a low level grumble then forget as the goal posts keep getting wider. If you add all this to the fact that the Muslims here are out breeding the white British makes me wonder how the hell we stand a chance.


 
21 Feb 2016 21:38:38
Kim, you are also spot on and people forget that as we get 98% of media cover that focus on the poor 'refugees'. It's bollocks there is no need for anyone to be homeless on the streets of the U.K. If you made the same decisions on a domestic level then you would stop buying your own children food and clothes and send them to the neighbors children because they have whined a little louder.


 
21 Feb 2016 18:14:44
For any modern country that is in the top economies of the world to have people sleeping on the streets is a disgrace. True socialism is the war on poverty. Something forgotten by modern "socialists"


 
22 Feb 2016 16:32:23
How can you be expected to sort out the rest of the worlds problems when you neglect your own.

Its not just the homeless. Its drug addicts. People with mental illness. Returning veterans who are just abandoned (many of them with psychological problems who form a part of the homeless) repeat offending criminals.

There are plenty of people who need help in this country that do not get it.

I'm not saying neglect the rest of the world. But sort your own issues out first.


 
23 Feb 2016 18:24:18
but you are not allowed to air those type of views in your own country kim, without being told you are racists or selfish etc. the trouble is a world being run by money men who don't give a xxxx about those below them. starvation and homelessness in the world dosent need to exist they allow it to exist. Also why do those adverts claim that £2 a month is all that's required when we know they need a hell of a lot more than that. all the politicians can do is quote a lot of made up facts and figures instead of dealing with these problems, and where is "dave" he is running around Europe bleating about the eu, a small comfort i'm sure for the homeless as they try and find a safe spot to bed down in for the night, wake up next morning cold and hungry, that's if they have not been attacked during the night. And they call it "great" Britain, what's so "great" about it?