15 Apr 2017 12:38:45
right this is my take on the Syria chemical weapons event last week.

in my opinion it was a classic false flag attack.

would Assad do it? absolutely if he was on the back foot, it would have made more sense to use these weapons at the start before russia got involved officially .

but with isis on the run he uses them now?
come on!

i have read reports that it was a homemade chemical weapons dump, so there is a possibility that militias with nato help were behind this attack.

{Ed033's Note - Yes, Assad with the huge help from the Russians had just about won against ISIS etc., so the whole point of the false flag was to keep the US/zionists in the war over there to finish their agenda in Syria, before moving ISIS etc. terrorists and the war into Iran.

 
15 Apr 2017 15:10:00
I don't believe Assad used Sarin either last week or in 2013.

The immediate military response by the US without a proper investigation smacked of a well prepared plan. Couple that with the quick follow up of criticism of Russia for its support of Syria. What Putin does next will tell us how this war plays out. He will be reluctant to put boots on the ground.

I'm not surprised really but there has been seemingly no criticism of Israel for its airstrikes in Syria. It's open season on Syria, and I fear it will continue this way until Assad is toppled. And like Ed033 said the war will then move to Iran. I expect a major false flag blamed on Iran will signal the start of that.

{Ed033's Note - Yes, a false flag in Iran (and then blame the Iranians) is the most likely excuse for the US/zionists to start a military campaign in Iran, in theory they don't need a false flag in Iran, all they have to do is say ISIS terrorists are now in Iran so we have to go in and protect Iran from the terrorists.

 
15 Apr 2017 16:43:33
had to log in my tor browser as chrome and internet explorer lags/ crashes terrible on this site, works well on other on other web pages which is strange .

anyway back to the Syria chemical weapons event .
the mail online newspaper ran a story by a journalist called Louise Boyle on 29th January 2013 in which she said leaked documents from Washington that show Obama approved of using chemical weapons then blaming Assad .

the story was then binned and there is no link for it, i found someone on twitter who saved the image of the headline, i would put it on here but not sure how to do so .

if you want to view it go to my twitter page and looks at my posts today, i have just tweeted it out, hoping to track down the reporter and ask her why was the story dumped. my twitter handle is now (had to change it for various reasons ) @DIMBERLYisMI5

franky.

{Ed033's Note - Click on the below image for larger picture.

 
16 Apr 2017 08:27:21
Hey Franky, how sure are you that this article from the Mail is real? Do you remember it yourself or was it something you were told about later?

{Ed001's Note - more to the point, why would you believe anything from a publication so untrustworthy even wiki refuses to accept it as a source!}

 
16 Apr 2017 19:23:08
Short answer is no, but i did check a few sites before i posted.
it seems the article is real but there seems conjecture on why it was deleted.

one article confirms it was a real story but they pulled it because the Daily Mail admitted it was false; they were subsequently forced to pay libel damages to the British company it named.

that could be true but a story that big would have to go through lawyers and sub editors to even get out also it was pulled down within hours, i have tried to contact the journalist, no luck as of yet, if she replies i will update you all.

Two articles about the deleted Daily Mail story:

goo.gl/BozdV


goo.gl/ZEiuW

 
18 Apr 2017 17:44:35
I'd have to concur Franky, if not real, then why the detraction (assuming that is real also) . Good luck tracking down ms Boyle and please keep us posted.