09 Sep 2017 18:23:38
Latest video show from Rich Planet - 9/11 dis-info and lack of evidence of real planes hitting the towers.

Part 1 of 3

1.) 11 Sep 2017
11 Sep 2017 16:09:33
it was controlled explosions that brought the twin towers down.

{Ed033's Note - Not saying you're incorrect, but when do you think the explosives were placed in the entire tower complex?

2.) 11 Sep 2017
11 Sep 2017 20:28:42
whenever the CIA put it in motion, that was an implosion not an explosion, you could tell they way it came straight down like like watching a demolition programme on tv a building of that strength would never topple with a plane hitting the top of it.

{Ed033's Note - Yes, whatever type of missile that hit the towers wouldn't have caused the 3 towers (Twin Towers + Building 7 Salaman Brothers building) to fall into their own footprint.

However all WTC Buildings were destroyed on 9/11 (Difficult to explain) with Buildings 5 + 6 having round holes in them after the attack - difficult to explain this as well?

3.) 11 Sep 2017
11 Sep 2017 21:07:04
think of the strength that building would be ed it had shopping centres, banks and subways under it, it would be like a feather brushing it a plane hitting it.

{Ed033's Note - Yes, the twin towers were specially built to withstand multiple 767 plane impacts, even if a plane was travelling at over 550 miles per hour (which is an impossible speed for a 767 at tower level, but that was the alleged speed of the alleged 2nd plane that hit on 9/11).

4.) 11 Sep 2017
11 Sep 2017 22:22:28
there is footage of people being blew out the windows before the planes hit ed.

{Ed033's Note - There were allegedly some explosions in the basements of the towers before the missiles hit the Twin Towers. i haven't seen people being blown out of windows before the missiles hit.

5.) 12 Sep 2017
11 Sep 2017 23:09:59
I believe they were designed to withstand a direct hit from a 707, which was a very large and popular 4 enjine airliner at the time of the WTC construction. Much bigger than the aircraft that allegedly hit towers 1 and 2.

I am not against the hypothesis put forward by Judy Wood, but there is evidence that there was work on the lift shafts done in the weeks leading up to 9/ 11, with armed security guards at the lift doors, also the WTC was closed at three weeks notice for a weekend for ISDN line installation, and then there was the really weird art installation group who's behaviour was utterly bizarre by any standards.

I believe towers 1,2 and 7 were prepped for demolition weeks before 9/ 11, and they way they fell into their own footprint suggests controlled demolition.

But I cannot explain what happened to buildings 5 and 6. I don't believe fire or debris falling could do what happened to them. So I think in that respect Judy Wood is on to something, and I'm inclined to think it was a controlled demolition coupled with something else that we don't understand yet. She calls it a direct energy weapon. It makes sense that you would have some redundancy built in to such a huge undertaking. I also think when you look at some of the jumpers, there was no fire threatening them immediately so what was making them jump? Were they being microwaved by this so called direct energy weapon? What happened to the cars several blocks away cannot be easily explained either. Sixteen years later I have read and read on this subject, but still I have more questions than answers.

{Ed033's Note - yes, you're correct about 707s Rian and spot on with the rest imo. Some type of unknown black technology was used as part of the attack, but what that was is anyone's guess.

6.) 12 Sep 2017
12 Sep 2017 00:09:16
it was the mirror and the daily record i think that had the video of it ed i will try and get you the link.

7.) 14 Sep 2017
14 Sep 2017 00:20:21
All good post
It was nothing like we where told
To many things say lie
For it to be the way they try to say.