29 Feb 2020 05:09:11
NASA STS-75 Mission footage, 1996.

Now this footage has been on a lot of 'alien' programs saying we have jellyfish swimming in space.

Think about that? Would it not be more likely that the giant water tank NASA uses to fake these missions has a bacterial or microbial plume? Someone forgot the chlorine that day?

You may say I am jumping to conclusions, but imagining them being in water is made a lot easier when NASA ask the astronaut to describe what is "'swimming in the foreground".

If they were in 'space' you would naturally say 'floating' would you not?

Either way, we have jellyfish aliens? or space is faked? You choose.

Watch from 3m26s to 5m29s.

{Ed033's Note - Yes, this looks exactly like looking at microbes in water.

 
29 Feb 2020 19:45:03
Another good vid SM.

 
29 Feb 2020 20:01:13
But that's what looked like was in the vid above storm looked like a type of jelly fish.

 
01 Mar 2020 11:34:00
So microbes are real ed? Even though the mainstream scientists are constantly going on about 'microbial life'.

{Ed033's Note - This looks like microbes or something like microbes floating in water, but NASA is saying this in outer space.

 
01 Mar 2020 18:37:17
Thing is hsf, you can buy a microscope for next to nothing and look at the 'microbial life' yourself.

Not so easy getting into 'space'.

{Ed033's Note - Good one SM.

 
01 Mar 2020 18:46:41
Well it is outer space Ed. There are particles all over the place in space, these are usually what's left of the proto-planetary disc on a microscopic scale to a city sized asteroid scale. Everything else either coalesced into planets, asteroids, moons etc. Some also got trapped in gravity wells of planets and burned up.
It's still happening today too, you ever seen a shooting star? Well that's a small space rock burning up as it enters the Earths atmosphere.

It's also worth mentioning, if this footage were recorded in 4k, we wouldn't be having this discussion because you would see the particles more clearly.
Unfortunately the camera technology in 1996 wasn't that great.

{Ed033's Note - i guess if you continually repeat mainstream b.s., you lose the ability to see the obvious. Tis is clearly something [microbes?] in water and they are pretending it's outer space,

 
01 Mar 2020 22:38:24
Or maybe like ed and others speculate.
It was just filmed under water.
And not all that other stuff.

 
03 Mar 2020 08:52:04
The tech in 1996 was so bad, that's a shame. How about the tech in 1969 and how bad that must be compared with now? It must be an absolute doddle to get to the moon now by comparison and to show us crystal clear footage of them doing so, and yet.

{Ed033's Note - Should be a doddle to get to the Moon, especially if it is much closer than they say it is.