Talk Sense Member Posts

 

Joe's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded



Joe's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Joe's Posts

 

 

To Joe's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Joe's last 5 rumour replies

 

Joe's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Joe's rumours posts

 

22 Jun 2015 01:21:45
Hi everyone,

Been a long time since posting. Does anyone have any first hand experience using cannabis oil for cancer treatment?

I've read a lot about it but just wondered if anyone here had any objective views?
Or subjective for that matter.

Joe

{Ed033's Note - The first problem is whether you have an oil that works because just because it's called 'cannabis oil', doesn't mean it works and there are plenty of testimonies saying the 'cannabis oil' they used didn't work for them. i personally don't know where to get an oil that works or how to use it for treatment. i have only seen the Rick Simpson documentary with testimonies from people saying that the Rick Simpson THC oil works.

Rick Simpson THC oil and testimonies documentary below.


1.) 22 Jun 2015 13:50:46
Thanks Ed033 I'll watch that later

{Ed033's Note - i have written a short article on the alleged alternative cancer treatments that have been put forward here:

http://goo.gl/jgWFyZ


 

 

05 Jan 2015 16:57:43
Makes you wonder just what the Royal Family have to hide now they've been granted "absolute secrecy laws"

Joe

1.) Well they have been known to hang around with pedos, necros & murderers, and intermarry with nazis so I imagine quite a lot!


2.) I think the law changes only effect the Monarch, heir and second heir to the throne and Charles was very pally with Saville.
The 'buy-off' is the plans to increase freedom of information requests on organisations such as the Police Chiefs and Finance Ombudsmen, but you can't help but feel this is to protect old big ears.
Mac


 

 

20 Jun 2014 09:35:07
Hi all. Just got back from holiday and reading through all he posts I missed.

With regards to the post about exercise and the heart, there has been a lot of research into various levels of exercise and their effect on the cardiovascular system.

As Ed001 mentioned, light jogging has no real effect.

But the heart is an incredibly dynamic organ and is subject to structural remodelling in certain circumstances. Elite level athletes will often have larger hearts. The 4 chambers dilate to increase stroke volume, and the muscle becomes thicker due to frequent high intensity training.

Obviously this is a normal variant in an athlete.

But unfortunately there are some disease states which also dilate the cardiac chambers and hypertrophies the muscle - and differentiating disease from normal in an elite athlete can be extremely difficult, often impossible.

I know of one premiership rugby player who retired because of this, but apparently it's happened in other sports.

There was also a paper in the European Heart Journal last year that titled "Exercise Induced Right Ventricular Dysfunction and Structural Remodelling in Endurance Athletes"

It's sometimes necessary to implant a defibrillator in these people as they're at risk of fatal arrhythmias.

I have to stress that this is only usually seen in very high level athletes with a lot of training behind them.

Rik Mayall probably had undiagnosed coronary heart disease and simply had a heart attack. He was mid 50's and unfortunately it happens all the time.

RIP Rik

Regards to the discussion about running shoes, has anyone read Born to Run by Christopher McDougall?
It's a fascinating book which talks about human evolution and how we've evolved over thousands of years to run on the balls of our feet, but in recent years have been of cushioning our feet with sandals, shoes etc. which has conditioned us to run on our heels which is mechanically just wrong.

Probably doesn't sound very interesting but I do recommend it if you're interested in that sort of thing.

Sorry for the long post, but it's actually something I know a little about (for a change) so thought I'd share!

Joe

1.) Nice 1 joe interesting, I think I seen a tv science show last year were they tested a tribe member (cant remember which tribe) and a top usa college runner , the tribe runner who was barefoot ran longer and had less impact on his body than the american runner with state of the art trainers.


 

 

15 Oct 2013 23:24:21
I know this isn't everyone's cup of tea, but I find it interesting and is the main reason I became interested in conspiracy theories.

Below is a link to a book, supposedly found by a Ukrainian man and his friend, published by the USSR - about all of the known Alien races, their agendas, allies, enemies etc.

It was first published in the 1950's, and apparently given to USSR agents.

I don't post very often, but follow the site daily and haven't seen this mentioned before (might be wrong though).

Love to know what everyone thinks!

http://calameo.com/read/002667888b58fe4b9c77d

Joe

1.) Thats a very good and interesting link mate. Not seen or heard about it before. don't know exactly what to make of it but its very interesting.


2.) Its good is that mate.

Matty b


3.) 16 Oct 2013 09:44:07
How pathetic, obviously just a made up book, like seriously, how stupid can you get

Shaun


4.) I loved reading that joe thank you for the link, a lot of the stuff I have never heard off before, I posted a few months ago a youtube showing images of aliens last seen very similar to the images on those documents but joes link is far more documented, both imply that urban legends like demons/vampires/fairies etc are different alien races, really interesting stuff, I am just wondering edd033 have you ever heard of this book before and some of the information is new to you?

{Ed033's Note - I may have heard it mentioned before but not read it. There's loads in there I hadn't heard before.


5.) Shaun. i wouldn't say pathetic at all. i thought it was very interesting to be fair.

matty b


6.) What I found really interesting was the information about people going missing the years later turning up and committing suicide.

what makes this book more interesting than most is it is a old book and I thought it would have been more accessible for the public to read,
i will look in to this book a lot more and the writers in the next few weeks
just to clear any doubts I may have but the information on there is the best I have read in a good few years.


7.) Thanks for the reply's, glad I'm not the only one who was intrigued.

Shaun, shame you found it pathetic mate. That's your prerogative, and each to their own; but from what I read on here most days most people are very open minded and judging by the feedback I'm glad I posted it.

Franky, you mentioned doing some further research into it. Can you post anything interesting you find?

Cheers


8.) Yeah mate as soon as I find out anything or can not find out anything I will post it, this is going to be harder than most because there is a load of stuff I have never heard, the two guys who have updated the book have you got names mate?


9.) I read that and didn't know what to make off it, was far fetched but a lot makes sense.

will have to read again.

cheers to the original poster


10.) Hi Franky, I can only partially help with the names. Dante Santori is the name of the guy who published it online. Apparently he's Italian.

He is one of the 2 that found the book. His friend, the Ukranian, is only known as Petro, who apparently died in a road traffic accident.

Hope this helps mate


11.) Cheers mate.


 

 

23 Mar 2013 12:32:41
Just read the thread on global warming a bit further down and it's certainly a hot topic (sorry, couldn't resist!)

But here's something to consider.

In 1988 Thatcher founded the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change.

Their job wasn't to research climate change, but to prove global warming was man made. She campaigned tirelessly to governments around the world that the earth was getting hotter, and that C02 emissions and industry was responsible.

She was a huge advocate of nuclear power, had well documented issues with Britains coal industry and a reluctance to rely on middle eastern oil or Russian gas.

She basically told a massive lie, with no significant scientific evidence to support her claims. But given her scientific background, people believed her.

In 2003 she reversed her opinion. Writing in her book, Statecraft, she said she very much doubts that global warming is man made, and that solar activity and other natural factors are responsible.

What I find incredible is nobody seems to care.

Just another example of how the worlds leaders can manipulate the masses to achieve their goals.

Joe

Joe

1.) If thatcher said it is going to be cold in Siberia I would take my flip flops and Bermuda shorts and some sun tan lotion.


2.) - brilliant, love it


 

 

 

Joe has no Banter Posts

 

 

Joe's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Feb 2016 20:41:43
I don't think he did it, and don't necessarily think he's not a nice person (at least not based on what you see on camera) .
It's noted that he has a low IQ and as such, made a few poor decisions in his youth.

The lead prosecutor is disgusting. The live press conference he gives when first indicating Brendan's involvement was damning enough to have a lasting effect on everyone who saw it;

The DNA specialist who broke protocol for the first time in her career, and in doing so used the only piece of "blood evidence" so a retest couldn't be performed;

The complete lack of blood in Avery's trailer or garage (even though Brendan said Avery stabbed her in the neck and cut her head off) ;

The police officer who radioed dispatch to report the missing vehicle a couple of days before it was "found" in Avery's yard;

And so many other loose ends, it's impossible to mention.

The whole thing is bent. This case was unique because it was being filmed from the beginning, as a result of Avery's previous wrongful imprisonment.

It begs the question, how many other cases are based on complete lies?

Joe

{Ed007's Note - I struggled at first to get my head round why they had so much footage etc, Joe and I've still avoided reading up on it so far.}


 

 

Click To View This Thread

22 Jun 2015 13:50:46
Thanks Ed033 I'll watch that later

Joe

{Ed033's Note - i have written a short article on the alleged alternative cancer treatments that have been put forward here:

http://goo.gl/jgWFyZ


 

 

Click To View This Thread

Like the holo-deck on Star Trek

Joe

{Ed033's Note - yes or you're placed in a pod or avatar or machine like the matrix.

Think about this, when you can afford to retire and if the technology exists, people may like to enter into a simulation where their memory is wiped and they then play a 'game of life' in a programmed simulation. If they 'die' in the simulation, they get a memory wipe and they restart the game.

It's possible that with a few people, the memory wipe isn't perfect and there are a few vague memories from before.

And just like the matrix, it's not a perfect game world where it's all peace and harmony but it's good vs evil.


 

 

Click To View This Thread

What's a D notice?

Joe

 

 

Click To View This Thread

Kaizer, I'd recommend reading Michael Crichtons book "The State of Fear"

Whilst it's a fictional novel, it's an accurate description of the scientific inaccuracies and politically driven agendas of people who are pro climate change.

Like all of Crichtons books, its built solidly on facts and well worth a read if you've got the time

Joe

 

 

 

Joe has no Banter Replies