02 Jul 2021 11:34:09
With the flat earth model, I think that it's down to what you sense about the reality you live in.

What I mean is, science and math with an added amount of CGI, can be twisted and messed around with to have an end that suits their theory.
So a lot for me boils down to words we use aeroplane and sea level for example .
I never can feel the rotation with a wobble.
Gravity is very selective.

The stars can work on a flat or ball.
When it comes to Antarctica what do any of us really know apart from second hand information from a selective and privileged few.
Also Circumnavigation East/West can be done on both. But not south [over Antarctica] to north, which has never been done.

And for me personally, if u go though all the different ideas, stories and accounts:
Flat Earth model with firmament,
Inner Earth,
Frozen lake Earth,
Or space, deadly dangerous where we're going to die any minute on Earth.

What actually feels more correct and makes more sense to people?

{Ed033's Note - What about that no engineer or anyone else ever has to account for either curvature or the Earth spinning faster than the speed of sound.

Earth is not a globe and doesn't move, but exactly what it is we don't know.

Any 'Glober' should start debunking the Flat Earth model by showing that we have to account for either curvature or the Earth spinning faster than the speed of sound. And if they can't, then we can say the Flat Earth model has credibility and needs to be investigated.

 
02 Jul 2021 14:01:54
Good points and I agree about people having a serious look and trying debunking the theory.
Because First off like most we all take it as it's got to be a joke at first .

{Ed033's Note - Yes, everybody thinks it's a joke at first.

 
08 Jul 2021 09:43:54
The reason it's treated as a joke is its obviously key. question earth and you jump to satellites, fake history, the moon, Antarctica etc. can of worms best kept as a joke to those not in the club.

 
08 Jul 2021 10:49:33
I Hear that Ben.