Talk Conspiracy Member Posts

 

Standard's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


Current Profile Picture:
Click to view larger image
Standard's Profile Picture

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




Standard's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Standard's Posts

 

 

To Standard's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Standard's last 5 rumour replies

 

Standard's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Standard's rumours posts

 

02 Mar 2020 00:05:18
Ed033, is your believe in the flat earth because the book written 4000 years ago mentions it to be a circle? Honest question?

I'm interested in your theory although it's completely wrong. In physics it is shown due to gravity and mass of objects speheres are a natural occurance If the earth is flat, how do the outsides of the flat circle stay up and just ignore gravity? Would be pretty revolutionary stuff if we could figure out how that was done. How do other planets and stars and the majority of objects in space become a sphere due to gravity but our magical earth just ignores it. Baffling.

{Ed033's Note - No, i don't read the Bible. I have an open mind and realised the heliocentric model has problems and the globe model has problems. I go where the evidence takes me.

If you want to know why i say what i say, then you'll have to watch all the videos over the past 10 pages on here. This site isn't just about the Flat Earth Model.

The idea of this site is if you're intrigued by the content, you stick around, if not, you leave. This site is not about posters trying to have a fight by defending mainstream info, this is not a mainstream site. If you like mainstream info, then you should visit other sites such as the BBC and NASA web sites and you can bathe your mind in all their content.

I thnk you'll find that 'gravity' is the magical entity.


1.) 02 Mar 2020 07:19:09
I only explained a few days ago that mainstream science had to make up dark energy and dark matter to make the theory of gravity work. There is absolutely no proof in either other than the fact that if they are not there gravity is wrong.

Name any other theory where so much has been made up, for it to work?

Maybe do some research in to incoherent magnetism [gravity].


2.) 02 Mar 2020 09:37:36
Orwell did say it though.
There be no need for police because people will do the police work .
Same must be for education .
Or maybe gravity isn't as is taught.


3.) 02 Mar 2020 09:41:15
If the earth is flat why here in Australia are we unable to see the North Star and the constellations are upside down?

{Ed033's Note - ok, good question. This video explains it.


 

 

27 Feb 2020 14:02:36
I don't mind some conspiracies but surely you can't believe flat earth and that space doesn't exist? That's crazy talk. Physics shows us the earth is round but simply, look at the moon, look at the stars. How on earth can the stars not exist? I'm bemused.

{Ed033's Note - And you should be bemused. You can watch some videos on here and if you're still intrigued you can return and watch more videos. If you're not intrigued, then you can call it crazy and leave, it's up to you.

I'll just say 4 things here:

No. 1. The Globe model curvature maths is about 8 inches per mile squared. 1 mile = 8 inches, 2 miles is 2 squared x 8 = 32 inches. 3 miles is 3 squared x 8 = 72 inches.

So, we can see that on the Globe model at some point the curvature of the Earth means we shouldn't see objects miles into the distance.

But what if you have a good zoom camera like a Nikon P900 and someone can zoom into objects that should be hidden by the curvature of the Earth? What if people can zoom into objects that should be hidden by 100s of feet of curvature? This is why people are Globe sceptics.


No 2. What we observe is the further from a light source we are, the dimmer it appears. This can be worked out mathematically using the inverse square law of light. The Heliocentric model has the Moon being around 225,000 miles away, the Sun at around 93 million miles away and all the Stars at over 4 lightyears away.

The problem being if we take the closest of those objects, then the Moon light should be quadrillions of lumens, which is an impossibility. It's no wonder then that some people are thinking that we have a local Moon, local Sun and local Planets and Stars. But we have to call Stars, Luminaries because we have no clue what the 'Stars' we observe are.

Also when we observe the Moon at night with clouds around it, we see the clouds that are immediately around the Moon are very bright and we observe that the clouds that are just a little bit further from the Moon are dark.



No. 3. Why are all the space agencies faking Outer Space? If you don't think they are, watch some videos on here or elsewhere.



No. 4. How is it possible to have the vacuum of outer space, directly next to our pressured atmosphere?


1.) 27 Feb 2020 21:47:55
Ed, i love all this stuff on this site

I have a quick question.
Have you ever visited an observatory?

Thx.

{Ed033's Note - No. Glad you like this site.


2.) 27 Feb 2020 22:45:01
Forgive me, I wasn't calling you crazy moreso the idea. I'm not often interested in debates because it's just 2 people trying to make the other believe their view. However, I shall watch how much of the videos you've shared I can bare, before my science knowledge shakes its head at it.

You should read astrophysics for people in a hurry, by Neil degrasse Tyson. He has a chapter called 'on being round' and it very adaquetly explains it I believe.

1. how have you came to the conclusion we shouldn't see objects in the distance? That does not make sense to me unless I'm misunderstanding you.

2. The Sun is 400 times bigger than the moon, yet 400 times further away from the earth than the moon. This is maybe why the moon and sun look the same size. The reason the sun's luminosity is much higher is due to the amount of energy the sun has. It's literally a burning ball of energy while the moon is a chunk of the earth orbiting us.

3. If outer space is being faked, then Elon Musk is wasting a lot of time on his company space x. I have nothing else to say on this, as I could also say the star Sirius doesn't exist, although we can see it.

4. Why can't you have that?

Just to be clear, do you think other planets are flat as well or only earth?

Cheers.

{Ed033's Note - 1. I'm not saying we shouldn't see objects in the distance. If we can see them then we can see them and something is there. Nobody knows how far Stars are away from us, i'm sying they're not lightyears away.

2. Nobody knows whether any of this is correct. It's all theory. This site shows the problems with those theories and shows an alternative.

3. Of course we can see the luminary we call Sirius, but it's not lightyears away, it's local and likely in the Firmament. If Elon Musk wants to be part of the Spac Agencies ,then Space X has to do fake outer space like all other space agencies around the World.

4. Earth is not a planet. The 'planets' are luminaries, i don't now what planets are but they are not flat, the planets move, the Earth is stationary, the Sun, Moon, Planets and Stars move above the Earth. The heliocentric model is an incorrect theory. The heliocentric model has Earth spinning at 1000 miles per hour, Earth rotating around the Sun at 66,000 mph, The Sun moving through the Milkyway at 500,000mph and the Milkyway moving through the Universe at over 1 million mph . And yet there is evidence that Earth is not moving, The Michelson-Morley experiment is devastating to the heliocentric model.

The Earth is a realm fixed in place, doesn't move, doesn't rotate and above it are the Sun, Moon, and Luminaries (Planets and Stars).


3.) 28 Feb 2020 07:20:12
Standard. I can only speak for myself but it's not a case of believing that the Earth is flat. (And I don't believe anyone on this site has said space doesn't 'exist'. It just doesn't in the form of mainstream perception. )

It is more a case of NASA faking space and the fact there is no photos of the Earth that haven't been run through the 'Blue Marble' framework (basically photoshopping) where they layer 2d images across a globe model.

NASA even sent a 'satellite' into 'space' just to take photos of the Earth. Yet on closer examination, they are still using the 'Blue Marble' 3d model to run the images through. Now why is that? Why not just take a picture and show us the raw image. Why are they altering the image? for what purpose?

NASA also faked the Moon missions. If you care to take the time on these pages you will find the NASA footage they didn't want you to see.

The question of the flat Earth becomes a possibility because of these things.

Then to add weight you have the Antarctic Treaty. You can not go beyond 60 degrees south latitude without permission from higher powers. And then It would be impossible to explore because of the limitations.

The say it is 'pure' down there. But I have seen uninhabited island/ lands strewn with crap from the western world. How does this not get to Antarctica? . I assume all climatic airflow also circumvent this part of our world, as there is no pollution down there?

Basically things just don't add up. I have just posted a video on the 'dogma' of science as we know it. How they make us believe things are fact when it true reality they are no better than unproven theories with no one bit of proof to back it up.

Gravity is something that is also brought up with the flat Earth model. But gravity has a serious flaw. And to cover up this flaw mainstream science has created 'dark matter' and 'dark energy' to patch the glaring holes in this flaw. That's 96% of our supposed Universe. So they have a theory that is 96% incorrect.

Things like this go unnoticed when people just believe what they are told. If you want a serious career in the sciences, you dare not question the dogmatic truth.

I could go on, but I feel my words fall on deaf ears.

{Ed033's Note - Sounds all good to me Southern Monkey, thanks.


 

 

07 feb 2016 13:24:54
anyone know of any websites/ videos to learn about what's happening in iraq and countries over the world + overall history etc.

thanks guys :) , hope you understand what i mean!

{Ed033's Note - i think you may want to know about the ottoman empire


1.) 07 Feb 2016 16:34:15
History Of the Middle East Part 1 of 5


 

 

20 Jan 2016 07:45:19
What do people think of Megalodon sharks? Do they still exist?


1.) 20 Jan 2016 12:56:52
There was that incident a few years ago where a 9 foot White Shark had been tagged; and when the scientists who tagged it were analysing the data, they found out that the shark had been chased by another predator and eaten whole. They came to this conclusion because of the instant change of body temperature.
Some seem to think it is an extremely large White Shark in the region of 25 + foot; while some speculate it was something else. The Megladon was mentioned.

goo.gl/EPiWcH

I actually think it was a massive White. I have seen an 18 footer up close when I was in SA. It was truly amazing to see such a creature. The thought of them being bigger is amazing. I mean, I cannot describe just how incredible they are.

{Ed033's Note - It's likely that this White Shark was eaten by 1 or several killer whales. Killer whales can hunt in packs.


2.) 20 Jan 2016 13:28:55
Who knows what exists or still exists in the deep! We apparently know more about space.


3.) 20 Jan 2016 15:20:47
I agree with you Bun. Who knows what lurks down there.

BTW Ed: I believe they dismissed Killer Whales because of the depth the Shark was killed at and the body temperature of the predator that killed the Shark was different to a Killer Whale.

{Ed001's Note - seems unlikely they would know that, considering Sperm Whales hunt at the deeper depths and the only known predator of the Great White is the Killer Whale. There are Orca pods which specialise in hunting and eating sharks, in particular Great Whites.}


4.) 20 Jan 2016 17:00:46
Not sure Ed. I am not that informed about Killer Whales and their attack patterns; or the depths in which they attack. I am just quoting what the scientists said.

{Ed001's Note - most scientists know little about them either mate, it is only recently they even realised that pods of Orca hunt Great Whites. Scientists also claimed they were no danger to humans, even though abalone divers in US would tell tales of how dangerous they are. When the divers for the D-Day landings were sent to the States to train in clearing mines prior to the attack, the local divers would tell them that they were to immediately get out of the water if Orca were spotted but they said Great Whites were unlikely to attack. Scientists always used to dismiss that as fanciful tales, but now it is known Orca are extremely dangerous under certain conditions.}


5.) 20 Jan 2016 17:57:42
I watched a good documentary about them once, which showed these Killer Whales toying with a seal before they killed it. I felt for the poor old seal.

{Ed001's Note - they are incredibly intelligent as well.}


6.) 20 Jan 2016 19:13:42
I've heard that line many a time grow bun, and I have to say its ridiculous. While the study of space certainly garners more eyes and financial backing than that of the ocean, what is becoming apparent is that the universe is expanding at a faster pace every day. Leading to the widely acknowledged theory of it being infinite. The ocean may be deep, but infitinitely deep I think not. Not to mention we know of a massive amount of species that live in the ocean, and a even more massive number of sub species etc. We know of different vegetation, micro organisms, breeding patterns and we can even show where land masses were once covered by sea, and ones that now are that once weren't. In contrast, people still debate whether we have even landed on the moon. While some or most on this page believe in alien life outside of our planet, I'm yet to see it proven. So using logic you'd have to say we know a bucket load more about the ocean than we do about space.

I don't know if you've been tracking the story of seaworld and another place whose name escapes me, in the US, Ed001, and the mistreatment of Orcas. Its incredible how poorly these animals have been treated, for a prolonged time, when the evidence shows how incredibly smart and social they are. Even going as far as having a complex language and as you say, the ability to using pack hunting techniques to not only kill Great Whites, but some pretty sizable whales. Easily one of the most fansciniting creatures on earth. The way they heard seals into the shallows and attack them right at the shorelines is insane.

{Ed001's Note - I have read a bit of it, though I am personally very much a shark lover, so don't like Orcas as they hunt them. Sharks fascinate me. I did read a few bits about it, it is amazing they were able to get away with it and no one challenged the practices. I found it difficult to have sympathy for the staff that were attacked as those animals are being disgracefully treated. I find it astonishing Sea World was not shut down.}


7.) 20 Jan 2016 20:00:01
I think I have seen the documentary about the tagged great white and from memory I believe it was off Australia just north of the GBR and I'm sure there was a slipstream of water that was warmer and had a higer salt content!

But they eventually come to the conclusion it was an orca or orcas! Some of the chunks out of sperm whales is always quite interesting! I have no doubt that there are things large things that we have no knowledge about under the ocean. Just remember the crazy pressure down there! True vertical depth X weight of the water in PPG X 0.052 will tell you there pressure of said depth


 

 

 

Standard has no Banter Posts

 

 

Standard's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

08 Mar 2020 04:26:26
Southern monkey. It is not hard to understand why the images are edited. The scale we are talking about is huge. It's like taking a panoramic photo on your phone. It needs to be edited for you to see an actual image rather than a whole lot of nothing.

{Ed033's Note - Standard, you've already said you don't want to watch the videos on here, you only want to read text. I think you read, "why photoshop any images of the Earth?" and gave an answer to it. Had you watched the video, you would be perplexed by the 2 moons.

Also, had you watched the video, you would of heard that this satellite is allegedly a million miles away from Earth. At that distance the alleged Globe Earth can easily be seen as a whole. Remember the alleged photos of the whole Earth taken from the surface of the Moon, which is allegedly 225,000 miles away?


 

 

Click To View This Thread

02 Mar 2020 00:14:17
Southern konkey, that's the problem. I could make a video very easily showing whatever I like. Learn the other side mate. Read a book and study physics. You would see why we mock your views. It's because they're completely wrong. We can't argue our points because your choosing to ignore even the simplest laws of the universe. Explain your best points as to why the universe is flat. I don't want videos and I won't show you nasa videos. I'll tell you simple physics.

{Ed033's Note - The whole point of the videos so someone doesn't have to write an essay. Your mind is so closed, you won't watch the videos on here.


 

 

Click To View This Thread

02 Mar 2020 00:11:44
Southern monkey. Our mass relative to the mass of the drinks play a big part. Now look at the mass of the earth and stars and now look at the mass of us. Higher the mass higher the gravity, we don't feel the spin or the earth moving due to our smallness. Do you feel yourself moving on a plane?

Why do you guys think we're so special? Why would we be a flat circle and everything else speheres. It literally makes no sense. Some of the videos I've watched on here also take the smallest physics knowledge to know how wrong they are. Or they completely ignore physics and make up there own laws of the universe.

{Ed033's Note - A lot of the physics is made up B.S. especially the stuff about the magical thing called 'gravity'.


 

 

Click To View This Thread

27 Feb 2020 22:45:01
Forgive me, I wasn't calling you crazy moreso the idea. I'm not often interested in debates because it's just 2 people trying to make the other believe their view. However, I shall watch how much of the videos you've shared I can bare, before my science knowledge shakes its head at it.

You should read astrophysics for people in a hurry, by Neil degrasse Tyson. He has a chapter called 'on being round' and it very adaquetly explains it I believe.

1. how have you came to the conclusion we shouldn't see objects in the distance? That does not make sense to me unless I'm misunderstanding you.

2. The Sun is 400 times bigger than the moon, yet 400 times further away from the earth than the moon. This is maybe why the moon and sun look the same size. The reason the sun's luminosity is much higher is due to the amount of energy the sun has. It's literally a burning ball of energy while the moon is a chunk of the earth orbiting us.

3. If outer space is being faked, then Elon Musk is wasting a lot of time on his company space x. I have nothing else to say on this, as I could also say the star Sirius doesn't exist, although we can see it.

4. Why can't you have that?

Just to be clear, do you think other planets are flat as well or only earth?

Cheers.

{Ed033's Note - 1. I'm not saying we shouldn't see objects in the distance. If we can see them then we can see them and something is there. Nobody knows how far Stars are away from us, i'm sying they're not lightyears away.

2. Nobody knows whether any of this is correct. It's all theory. This site shows the problems with those theories and shows an alternative.

3. Of course we can see the luminary we call Sirius, but it's not lightyears away, it's local and likely in the Firmament. If Elon Musk wants to be part of the Spac Agencies ,then Space X has to do fake outer space like all other space agencies around the World.

4. Earth is not a planet. The 'planets' are luminaries, i don't now what planets are but they are not flat, the planets move, the Earth is stationary, the Sun, Moon, Planets and Stars move above the Earth. The heliocentric model is an incorrect theory. The heliocentric model has Earth spinning at 1000 miles per hour, Earth rotating around the Sun at 66,000 mph, The Sun moving through the Milkyway at 500,000mph and the Milkyway moving through the Universe at over 1 million mph . And yet there is evidence that Earth is not moving, The Michelson-Morley experiment is devastating to the heliocentric model.

The Earth is a realm fixed in place, doesn't move, doesn't rotate and above it are the Sun, Moon, and Luminaries (Planets and Stars).


 

 

Click To View This Thread

23 Feb 2018 01:20:44
This guy has been reported saying he wants to be a famous school shooter, and that was last year. FBI were called on him numerous times however they were very complacent with investigating him. Don't see mind control

Not too sure about this second shooter stuff, however, why is there always an apparent second shooter? Furthermore what difference does it make. The problem still is how easy it is to get your hands on guns in America, there could be 7 shooters, it's a big problem.

{Ed033's Note - 2 Witnesses to more than 1 shooter:

Posted by Rian (thanks Rian) - Witness 1:
Have a look at this before it’s deleted.

goo.gl/xD373

Witness 2:


 

 

 

Standard has no Banter Replies