Talk Sense Member Posts

lew99's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

lew99's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To lew99's Posts

lew99's rumours posts with other poster's replies to lew99's rumours posts

29 Jul 2018 21:01:13
Hi Guys,

Haven't been on here in a while but some great reading to be done it seems, as always.

Currently interested in the dark side of the moon theories and Mars was visited by us many years back, can anyone shed any light on some good material to read or watch.

As always keep up the great work guys.

1.) 30 Jul 2018 09:10:57
What are you specifically interested in, regarding the "dark side of the Moon"?

Mars is very interesting, they recently discovered a liquid water lake under 20km of Ice on the south pole, which is a huge breakthrough as liquid water enhances the chances of life. They have already started drafting up plans for an ice penetrating mission to Mars, to see if we can find anything, which is fantastic news.

I very much doubt we visited Mars many years ago though, when you look at how we constructed buildings and means of transport, we've only recently in the last 200 years, started using Metal on a mass scale. For the 12,000 years previous it was wood and stone, we could not have got to space, let alone Mars using stone and wood.
And if you were talking about more recently, then I guess it's possible, but the Astronauts would have severe muscular and bone deficiencies, from spending so much time in Zero Gravity, and we'd know a hell of a lot more about Mars than we do ^_^.

2.) 30 Jul 2018 21:50:50
hsf - I read somewhere that the dark side of the moon has some secrets to tell. the moon hasn't been explored fully?

3.) 30 Jul 2018 22:41:51
Drafting up plans for an ice penetrating mission to Mars? Really? Who is doing that? What century do they plan to do it? Shouldnâ€™t they try going to the moon first? I think penetrating ice is the least of their problems.

4.) 31 Jul 2018 09:36:32
Rian, it will likely be done by NASA and ESA (European Space Agency) as a collaboration, much like the new James Webb telescope that's replacing Hubble, set for launch on 30 March 2021. They have had a plan to do the same thing on Europa, which was originally planned for mid 2020s (an unrealistic target to say the least) .
And what do you mean we should go to the Moon first? And why is penetrating the ice the least of their worries?

lew99, we haven't physically explored it no. However we have mapped the entire Moon using satellites.
youtube.com/watch?v=jdkMHkF7BaA
Additionally, there is no "dark side" of the Moon, it's just we only see one face of the Moon because it's tidal locked.

5.) 31 Jul 2018 11:20:30
If we've mapped the moon using satellites then surely we have photos of all the moon landing craft?

Of course hsf, you're coming from the perspective that you believe NASA are honest decent guys, and I believe the opposite.

If we get an unmanned mission to Mars again, let's collect one or two of those insects from the surface before we start trying to drill through 20km of ice.

But yes, we should try to put a human on the moon first. It's a lot closer.

{Ed033's Note - Good points Rian, NASA lies about everything so who knows what the truth is?

6.) 31 Jul 2018 11:30:40
What about black tech hsf? We only know what they want us to know. What about the theories of us being more technologically advanced in the past. Not having a go more interested on peoples thoughts.

{Ed033's Note - Correct p1, Someone on Earth was more technologically advanced in the past than the mainstream says and the mainstream can't recognise black technology, but without question it exists. They had to use black tech on 9/11 to turn the towers to dust, otherwise Manhattan may have flooded if the 'Bathtub' cracked.

7.) 01 Aug 2018 00:40:06
Rian, if you used a telescope to look at something really small would you see it? The answer is no, it would just be a monumental blur. For that you need a microscope, not a telescope designed for viewing the moon from orbit.
We have been to the Moon already, don't be so silly.

youtube.com/watch?v=RMINSD7MmT4

And are you talking about the missing pixels and the dust particles on the camera lense?

p1 and Ed033. Black tech seems to just be an appeal to ignorance fallacy and sounds like that typical religious view point, "Science can't prove it, therefore God". You need to show me some conclusive evidence in order to convince me, as I've never come across anything that proves it. I'm not dismissing the idea, as secret technologies have always been around (Greek Fire for example), but I need proof.

p1, Ancient civilisations being more advanced than we are? Not a chance in my view, there is no evidence for mass manufacturing with metals, plastics or polymers, which would be essential for things like electricity, which is essential for power and the progression of technology. Plus medicine has never been better than it is today, when you consider the ancient Egyptians (pioneers of the time) were diagnosing things like Dysentery as an having too much blood, prescribing a bloodletting as a remedy, then you kind of get the picture.

Another way to gauge it, is to look at the Tribes of the African plaines, or the tribes of the Amazon, 12,000 years ago, that was us.
It's likely that some are more advanced than we initially believed though. A few examples: Sumer (4500BC), knew that there were 8 planets in the solar system + Pluto and they knew that they revolved around the Sun, not around us. They also developed a written language over night almost.

Gobekli Tepei (between 10,500BC and 8000BC), it was believed that a sophisticated society was almost impossible back then, as we were hunter-gatherers which weren't capable of creating megalithic structures, then they discovered Gobekli Tepei and dated it to around 12,000 years old. 7,000 years older than Stone Henge and 50 times larger.

{Ed033's Note - There's loads of evidense/proof for black tech and previous civilisations being more advanced than the mainstream says. A lot of it has been pointed to on this site over the years.

You believe and repeat the mainstream version but if there was any substance to the mainstream version we'd all believe the mainstream version. Those of us using our own minds require proof from the mainstream, but all we get is spin and lies.

8.) 01 Aug 2018 12:40:50
hsf, I never said anything about telescopes or microscopes. What are you on about? You claim 'However we have mapped the entire Moon using satellites'. Maybe you think this mapping process wasn't very good.

But you did give us a link to a video of someone climbing down a ladder in a so called spacesuit, and in fairness you also cleared up the mystery of the meaning of the acronym ESA.

Trust NASA. They never lied.

Neither did Richard Nixon. Ever.

9.) 01 Aug 2018 14:24:20
Ok Rian, Moon landing. As Neil deGrasse Tyson says, show me your best piece of evidence and tell me what it will take for you to be proven wrong.

10.) 01 Aug 2018 18:13:02
Hsf can't think of the structure but its all different sizes including massive boulders to small intricate pieces which interlock perfectly together. I don't we could do this today with the technology we currently know about. Let alone with the primitive tools you would like me to believe were used.

Also have you watched the video about wireless electricity below. How where the ever so long tiny tunnels in the pyramids done. Black tech no evidence you say how long was the stealth bomber secret and unknown of. Was it made untraceable by chance? I doubt it. doesn't have to be alien tech to be black tech. Black tech is tech much further advanced than what the general public are aware of.

If you don't think it exists i don't know what to tell you as i'm pretty sure most people would agree there is black tech.

{Ed033's Note - There are a number of examples of building earthquake proof stone structures that can last for thousands of years.
One example is Sacsayhuaman:

11.) 01 Aug 2018 19:27:43
Thats the one ed thanks. Suppose they where intricately shaped with a stone axe among other primitive tools as the narrative would like us to believe.

{Ed033's Note - Exactly, who had the technology to either shape or melt rocks so they fit perfectly together.

12.) 02 Aug 2018 02:12:01
Of course they have some hidden technologies, I guess I'm reading into the words "black tech" wrongly and assuming you're talking about teleporters, black hole bombs, cloaking fields etc. You know, things that are edging on breaking the laws of physics, or just flat out ignoring them. I guess that comes from my dislike for Alex Jones. So I am happy to be corrected on that front, unless you are actually referring to teleporters etc.

Regarding Sacsayhuaman, it is fascinating how they built such complex structures. However, contrary to your comment about their primitive tools, you'll find they were actually using metal tools.
peruenroute.wordpress.com/2012/02/27/sacsayhuaman-how-incas-built/
I would also imagine that they're able to melt Granite (1260Â°C melting point) and Limestone (825Â°C melting point), as they were forging Bronze (950Â°C melting point) and Copper (1085Â°C melting point), they were also very good with mathematics, so it doesn't seem so farfetched to think they built these things without modern day technology or better. It was likely just a forgotten technique, as they didn't have a sophisticated enough writting system, in order to keep a record of it. It's actually argued that they didn't have a writting system at all.
www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/HistTopics/Inca_mathematics.html.

{Ed033's Note - Hsf seems to be agreeing that the builders were more advanced then the mainstream says.

13.) 02 Aug 2018 11:16:25
Wonder why we can't do that now?

14.) 02 Aug 2018 11:56:13
The only person talking about teleporters is you hsf.

p1 said 'Black tech is tech much further advanced than what the general public are aware of'.

And remember if it's not in Wikipedia it can't be true.

15.) 02 Aug 2018 12:34:29
How so Ed? I've not agreed with anything you've said. All I've said is that they used metal tools and that if they were able to forge Bronze and Copper, then they can melt Granit and Limestone.
That has nothing to do with disagreeing with the mainstream.

Everything I mentioned in the above post was mainstream views, so tell me. Where did I agree that they were more advanced than the mainstream says? In fact, my 2nd link is to the University of St. Andrews - a government funded page.

Nice try Ed, but I think now that you've try to spin my words, I'm done. Cya.

{Ed033's Note - An overreaction hsf, more like you know we can come up with more examples the mainstream never explains and you'll have to admit the mainstream are full of spin and lies.

16.) 02 Aug 2018 12:52:17
To be honest if a cataclysmic event were to happen today if you think about it. its not hard to lose the tech we have. Can you make a phone or a tv? Or the components required. Therefore its not hard the lose the tech especially if notes diagrams and explanations are lost.

And because info is kept more and more on computers instead of paper backed research it wouldn't be hard to loose the information we already know then the skills and techniques would be lost too.

17.) 02 Aug 2018 12:54:52
Also i believe the large stone formations are pre inca and the more primitive stone work is of the inca era. Sure that's what I've seen a documentary about.

{Ed033's Note - Sounds correct p1.

18.) 02 Aug 2018 19:19:26
I watched a video on YouTube of a guy attempting to do his own Stonehenge with nothing but counterweights and literally a pebble. Fascinating.
But I agree with ed, I reckon with the earth being so old that there probably has been older civilisations that have come and gone and have had superior tech.

{Ed033's Note - I've seen ths guy, but i tthink he'd have trouble replicating the Great Pyramid of Giza.

19.) 02 Aug 2018 19:25:33
Just to add about drilling 20km on mars, the record for drilling on earth is about 13km so that really would be some achievement.

20.) 02 Aug 2018 21:16:49
So hsf, can we melt stones rocks or boulders today, we cant.

21.) 04 Aug 2018 00:33:32
Lol
Space mabey the final frontier
But made in Hollywood basement
They don't go space they go in circles high up in our atmosphere
Thermosphere
Apparently
Also when they send satellites up lol
They build companions to take a pic
Trade center was bin laden
And pigs fly.

22.) 08 Aug 2018 22:49:09
hsf there is mounting evidence in relation to civilizations being a lot more advanced than previously thought. The MSM spouts the usual about the Inca building Cuzco, SacsayhuamÃ¡m and other megalithic sites in Peru / Bolivia, etc. However, even the earliest Spanish chronicles say the Incas told them they did not build these. The Inca say a race of "giants" preceeded them and created much of what exists today.

Our perception of humanities time has been founded on the Victorian explorers/ scientists who in turn projected their Christian outlook on history. Even still today vast citadels are being discovered in remote parts of the Amazon Jungle that do not fit any acceptable timeline.

You said yourself that Sumeria created a language overnight, which is far from true if you research it. It suited the MSM to explain it away as such.20 years ago we were assured no evolved civilization existed before Sumeria, just herders and nomads. Gobekli Tepe has disproved that lie. I am sure Gunung Padang and others like it will help push history further back too.

When mankind breaks free from the yoke of Religion we will finally know the truth of our worth and the legacy our ancestors left behind. I appreciate u have your own beliefs but when it comes to talking about past civilizations at least do the research. Sorry for the tome Ed been a long long time since I posted.

{Ed033's Note - welcome back, good reply.

16 Feb 2016 21:44:03
Tell me guys. Steven avery; Why would he have been set up? Just watched some of that making a Murderer. It's got me interested.

1.) 17 Feb 2016 12:52:23
Just a theory. But if the real perpetrator was connected then his connections could have framed a scapegoat to take the blame.

2.) 17 Feb 2016 16:04:01
There's, at the very least, 25 million reasons the police in that county would be willing to set the bloke up.

3.) 17 Feb 2016 17:00:16
Very good series. It could be as simple as he is an embarrassment to the people who lied so hard to put him there in the first place. Also, where he was suing them for his wrongful imprisonment and expected to receive millions of dollars, it wasn't going to be paid by the government. It would have come from the D.A's and police budget. They couldn't afford that. In the end he took a much much lower figure to pay his current legal bill.

The thing is, from this series, he looks innocent but there's hundreds of hours of footage and it has been condensed into 10 hours. I'm sure evidence from both side's has been left out.

08 Feb 2016 20:39:28
Anyone watching the new x-files, a great set of talking points raised.

1.) 08 Feb 2016 21:41:54
Lots of mentions regarding my 'favourite' subject 9/11. get ridiculed for sharing your views though. Everyone saw it 'LIVE' on tv so it must be true!

{Ed033's Note - With Manhattan, 'Everyone' saw skyscrapers being turned to dust using some unknown black technology. Everyone was told that skyscrapers collapsed due to fire. Most everyone believed what they were told.

Some people try to show the ridiculers the building 7 take down because you only need to get the ridiculer to watch a video for a few seconds and in addition, they didn't know that there was another building take down other than the twin towers and building 7 wasn't hit by a 'plane' and it looks like building 7 was a controlled demolition. Afterwards if the ridiculer is then intrigued, they may be open to watching a longer video.

2.) 09 Feb 2016 00:15:03
I've seen the 1st 3 already *smug look*. The 3rd one is rubbish but then they seem to do tongue in cheek ones now and again.

3.) 09 Feb 2016 11:41:19
Yeah I found the first episode ok the second is good and the third is maybe the worst X files episode ever

4.) 09 Feb 2016 13:26:01
The first episode and last 2 are directed by Chris carter which I presume will be the best ones. The others I think must be guest directors.

5.) 09 Feb 2016 18:29:54
great first episode. loved the back engineered craft in the faraday cage.

Has anyone seen the Ron Garner interview on youtube, very interesting, something defo going on check it out if you haven't seen it.

28 Jan 2016 19:53:17
Hi all,

First post but long time reader of this site some very interesting views are shared on here.

Read something relating to holocaust conspiracies the other day and got me intrigued. so I did some searching and as always there was loads of information relating to it.

What are people's views on this topic. slightly controversial I know especially as a first post.

{Ed033's Note - See, when you say holocaust, people should start asking, which holocaust are you talking about?

The Armenian holocaust? or the holocaust of the german people after WW2? or some other holocaust, as the Jewish holocaust (of which an unknown number of jewish people did really die) has so many lies about it, it's crazy.

Video below is based on the book Hellstorm by Thomas Goodrich about the unknown holocaust of german people after WWII.

1.) 28 Jan 2016 20:54:02
Thank you for the swift reply, I specifically meant ww2 and in particular Auschwitz. I read that one particular theory is that there wasn't even a gas pipe running to that area.

I thought this was the best place to get some feedback.

{Ed033's Note - i know you meant the Jewish Holocaust. The 6 million ritual figure comes from Jewish literature in the 1800s. After WW2 the russians changed certain things in 1 or more camps to make it look like there were 'death' gas chambers but the gas chambers were actually water shower rooms. There was zyclon b gas used at the camps but it was used to kill off any fleas / lice carrying deadly pathogens, which was widely used at the time in prisons even in America.

The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth

2.) 28 Jan 2016 22:27:37
You could argue that the hollocaust in question was the first false flag! Or at least the most complete! The idea has been used as a blueprint ever since! And it's not controversial on here, lew!

3.) 29 Jan 2016 10:07:09
The "chimeneys" at Auschwitz were thrown up after the so called liberation, they aren't and never were connected to anything, this was admitted by a guide at the camp, the so called gas chambers weren't gas tight so would have been completely useless for the purpose of mass gassings, they were in fact actual shower rooms, as you said plenty of things on the net to look through, keep on reading, you will be amazed at how the lie has been embedded into society and the consciences of the unquestioning.

4.) 29 Jan 2016 11:32:20
Very interesting. I hope this isn't a daft question but what is the point of false flagging ww2 concentration 'death' camps against Jews?

{Ed033's Note - To gain sympathy from everyone else to:
1. Create the State of Israel
2. To be given lots of business deals
3. To allow them to be part of the global decision making
4. To allow zionists to get into powerful positions
5. To get sympathy money
6. To allow them to get free loans
7. To allow them to start wars
8. To allow them to create Greater Israel
9. So no one can criticise Israel or Jews for anything
10. To allow them to threaten anyone or any country
any many more reasons

5.) 29 Jan 2016 13:20:47
Try looking up the holodomor if you want to see state enacted genocide. There's one never mentioned in the west.

{Ed033's Note - Yes, good one and the Irish holocaust where they were subjected to a deliberate man-made famine (which was later wrongly called the Irish Potato Famine)

6.) 29 Jan 2016 13:37:26
So Hitler was a front man for this operation, effectively meaning the whole war was a charade?

I've done lots of reading regarding cover ups and false flag. 9/11, sandy hook. JFK. moon landing etc. but this never crossed my mind.

Amazing how one little article has hooked my interest.

Thank you for the insightful responses.

{Ed033's Note - Hitler's main adviser was actually working for the allies so it's difficult to figure hitler out but, if you want to know more about hitler, it's very important to watch the below documentary. It's been split into 27 parts.

7.) 29 Jan 2016 18:07:47
The problem is people focus on the 6 million Jews. What about the other victims. Poles, Czechs, Ukrainians, Russians, the disabled, gypsies, homosexuals, the white rose, the generals, priests. What about the commando order, nacht und nebel, sippenhaft, wormhoudt, oradour. The nazis were filth led by a lunatic.

8.) 29 Jan 2016 18:47:54
Kim that's what I'm trying to understand. were they though or is it all a story?

9.) 29 Jan 2016 18:56:17
You could say the same about the Soviets and Stalin.

10.) 29 Jan 2016 21:01:19
the point is that for some reason hitler and the nazis were singled out to been more vile than any other in history. People forget that almost every other country in history has done vile things in war time. I think it was the english who started concentration camps! there has never been any proof of figures and they have even been officially changed throughout the years> the start of WW2 was no different to recent wars in that A country fights with another country and the english and the americans come wading in.

i think that hitler asked those mentioned to leave the country first. Its the same as the current migrant situation. If a country decided that enough is enough then if it decided to ask them to leave then why is it wrong. the jews were trying to bring germany down or at least a majority of them were.

{Ed033's Note - It's pretty important for people to watch the above 27 part documentary Adolph Hitler: The Greatest Story Never Told, for info on Hitler they don't know.

11.) 29 Jan 2016 21:27:04
I'm Russian you don't have to tell me about Stalin. As I mentioned the holodomor above. But agreed he doesn't get the criticism he deserves.

12.) 29 Jan 2016 21:30:15
I mentioned enough examples there of other victims of the nazis.

At the end of the day the core philosophy in both Mein kampf and the Nuremberg laws was the superiority of one type of human being over another human being. And from that came what?

13.) 30 Jan 2016 00:31:48
I have watched first 2 will plug my way through em ed!

{Ed033's Note - Great stuff growbun, it'll be worth getting through all 27 parts.

14.) 30 Jan 2016 04:44:22
Churchill was no wallflower either. He would have put Thatcher to shame.

15.) 30 Jan 2016 09:29:34
True Churchill certainly had blood on his hands too but that's not really talked about, as we know history is written by the victors, well mainstream "history" that is.
And yes Kim' Hitler had a hard on for Jews, but look at what was happening in Germany at the time hyper inflation, people starving, reparations, etc etc, and seemingly to Hitler and no doubt many others the Jews were sitting pretty at the centre of it all.

Look what's happening in the middle east now' palestinian people being forced off there lands and as good as being forced back into the stone age by a state set up by the victors, by the very people who were supposedly persecuted in the war, they are as good as doing the same, and the western powers do next to nothing'and the question to be asked is why? was Hitler so wrong to think these people were bad and the allies corrupt?

16.) 30 Jan 2016 13:21:19
As I said though it wasn't just the Jews. As soon as you bring eugenics into it anyone fitting the ideal becomes fair game. Racial undesirables were purged out of society. Would anyone like to see that repeated today? All these children with downs syndrome do we just go around injecting them? If we're wiping out people based on disability's where does that stop? Any philosophy or policy where you say one human being is inferior to another human being can only end one way.

And ultimate responsibility for what happened under the nazis has to reside with one person for creating that philosophy and allowing a culture to grow that enabled the worst excesses of human nature to flourish.

17.) 30 Jan 2016 21:53:25
You and I Kim will never agree, all I'm saying here now is I think Hitler did what he thought was best for his people, take care of your own 1st if we had more politicians like him now we would all be happier and as I said that's my opinion.

{Ed033's Note - Yes jimmy, you can't have 'discussions' with close-minded people.

18.) 30 Jan 2016 22:35:42
That's very true ed, my mind is as closed as Kim's, my life up to now has been complex, more so than most people. I've come into contact with life experience moulds the mind set and I've got no problem with mine although I feel the conflict internally from time to time.

If I'm honest, as things stand if you look at the way things are globaly now I feel for the upcoming indigenous western Europeans, their lands and way's of Life have been frittered away by people who will never have to deal with the fallout.

{Ed033's Note - We can come to conclusions but we should remain open to all possibility when we encounter new or different info.

i think that the control group now have to put the total control system (that's been planned for thousands of years) in front of people within the next 2 decades and they probably believe that even with the political correctness program, European people are going to reject it and because they don't want to ruin the thousands of years old plan, they have to remove the Europeans out of the equation.

19.) 30 Jan 2016 23:30:05
And that is happening now.

20.) 31 Jan 2016 01:14:35
You are correct but what if an existence of one group could be the end of another or a society when you don't receive the same love and respect that is given. And yes in cases you mention above them of course not, but the thread is about the mass ignorance to the facts of what really happened

{Ed033's Note - Who are you speaking to grow bun?

21.) 31 Jan 2016 10:07:39
I really don't know edðŸ„ðŸŒšðŸ’ŠðŸ’‰ðŸŒ¡

{Ed033's Note - Is that the mushrooms themselves communicating to us through you?

22.) 31 Jan 2016 11:02:10
Who's got a closed mind?

23.) 31 Jan 2016 11:06:27
Ed33 your saying the ultimate plan is to ruin Europe by destroying Europeans. Well wasn't your hero hitler a massive step forwards in that plan. All I said was any philosophy where you state that one human being is superior to another human being can only end in one way. Which is something we are seeing today. Unless of course you actually agree with nazi racial policy and eugenics theory?

I don't expect this to be posted as a lot of times when I post something you don't agree with it doesn't get posted. I thought this site was supposed to be free of censorship.

{Ed001's Note - no site can be free of censorship or it would just be flamed out of existence and turn into a place for trolls to post vile abuse. I agree with you though, anyone saying Hitler 'wasn't all that bad' needs help. Just because there are others that are just as bad, but don't get the bad press he did, does not make his vile racist policies fine. Yes he was put in place by the German Army, initially to be a spy, yes his efforts were funded by Rothschilds and others, but that was because they agreed with him, not because he was their puppet who was just doing as he was told.}

24.) 31 Jan 2016 11:35:05
Spasiba tovarisch editor.

There have been bigger monsters in history, Stalin and Mao n the same century. But anyone who thinks we need more hitlers I just cannot agree with that.

If doing the best for your own people means the exclusion and extermination of others then how is that to be considered right? That line of thinking excuses Milosevic and makes Rwanda acceptable.

That is not what I was raised to think, even by a regime that had murdered millions of its own citizens.

We see the same philosophy present in Isis condemning anyone they consider inferior.

We are all human beings and have to share this planet. One day in peace hopefully away from bullshit religious and racial superiority dogma.

25.) 31 Jan 2016 11:08:52
Id also like to know the thoughts of one of the other editors as well on this particular topic.

{Ed033's Note - I'm interested in whatever the truth maybe. i don't know what the truth is but no one else does either. i'll keep my mind open and alter my current view with new info. This is why it's important to look at new info and that's why i put up youtube videos, not to say this is the truth but to say here is some info you may not know about.

You know when people are brainwashed on a particular subject, because they go crazy on the subject repeating the mainstream media, politically correct version.

This is not a mainstream media version web site, so don't expect it to be.

26.) 31 Jan 2016 15:51:00
Just because something is an alternative view or goes against the mainstream doesn't make it the truth either.

27.) 31 Jan 2016 18:41:55
I don't think anyone is saying that Kim. I for one like your posts Kim and really hear where your coming from but this isn't in debate.

28.) 31 Jan 2016 22:39:10
Well off to embassy tomorrow so won't be on much.

29.) 01 Feb 2016 21:19:20
Quite glad to see Ed001's reply on this and Ed033!

I know I'm quite 'mainstream' (if you like) but I'm cynical enough to always ask questions. honest ðŸ˜¬.

lew99 has no Banter Posts

lew99's rumour replies

Click To View This Thread

30 Jul 2018 21:50:50
hsf - I read somewhere that the dark side of the moon has some secrets to tell. the moon hasn't been explored fully?

Click To View This Thread

08 Feb 2016 21:41:54
Lots of mentions regarding my 'favourite' subject 9/11. get ridiculed for sharing your views though. Everyone saw it 'LIVE' on tv so it must be true!

Click To View This Thread

29 Jan 2016 18:47:54
Kim that's what I'm trying to understand. were they though or is it all a story?

Click To View This Thread

29 Jan 2016 13:37:26
So Hitler was a front man for this operation, effectively meaning the whole war was a charade?

I've done lots of reading regarding cover ups and false flag. 9/11, sandy hook. JFK. moon landing etc. but this never crossed my mind.

Amazing how one little article has hooked my interest.

Thank you for the insightful responses.

Click To View This Thread

29 Jan 2016 11:32:20
Very interesting. I hope this isn't a daft question but what is the point of false flagging ww2 concentration 'death' camps against Jews?

lew99 has no Banter Replies