Conspiracy Talk 4

 

Use our posting form to send us conspiracy talk.

(single word yields best result)
 

10 Feb 2020 16:10:55
David Weiss went to visit his mother in a home for the elderly. He asked his mother; who was the oldest one there and was still lucid. Ruth was taught the Earth was flat in the 1920s.

In a video from before on this site, there was a newspaper report saying that Flat Earth was taught in schools in the early nineteen hundreds.

Flat Earth and all that goes with it means Earth is a creation and therefore there must be a creator of the creation.

However, the satanic lucifereans want us to think we are insignificant nothings in a gigantic universe where the Earth and all life on Earth came about by mere chance and macro evolution.

Agree0 Disagree0

13 Feb 2020 20:22:27
Believe in the globe and the universe you are weakened and alone?

Believe in a flat immovable Earth, an intelligent Creator and everything seems right?

You can not fake the tears of happiness this lady had when told what DITHRH believes to be true.

Now if she believed things the other way round, would the video be the same?

{Ed033's Note - I don't think it would. Look at the difference between an enclosed, fixed and flat special creation, created for us by God who could be just above the Firmament and an insignificant spec of dust in a vast universe, where there are billions of other specs of dust and where it all happened by chance with macro evolution explaining all lifeforms.

What this video shows is the mainstream lies of Flat Earth being settled as a concept hundreds of years ago - Clearly it was a concept in the 1920s.

09 Feb 2020 21:58:12
How far back does the 'strawman' (your legal self) go, and why does Roman ethics still exist in Our law system.

I suggest slowing the video down to 0.25 speed as it is too much information to process otherwise.

I have researched some of it an it adds up, also tying in with Ed033 'Corpus Juris' post a while back.

I have a virus of sorts so not thinking on my normal level, but this seems legit.

Just how ****ed are we?

The Roman Empire Never Fell

{Ed033's Note - Anna von Reitz wrote a brief report trying to explain what's going on

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Feb 2020 14:08:45
What's Worse Than Hiv? Airborne Hiv?

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Feb 2020 14:30:27
Very scary.

09 Feb 2020 20:36:41
I got the flu jab for the first time last October, for reasons other than to (supposedly) protect myself.

It was the same day (just after I arrived home) that you posted about the full genetic sequence of cancer having been reportedly found inside the vaccine.

Made me feel a bit sick, so I skipped that post.

But here I am suffering from what I can only describe as 'flu' (coronavirus? ) reading reports that there is a link between 2019-nCoV and HIV-1 which is "unlikely to be fortuitous" and I agree it's very scary.

The fact countries own patents to things like 'SARS' etc makes it even more worrying.

This IMHO is a weaponised viral attack/ training exercise. I just don't know how many sides there are to the elite coin, so it is hard to figure out the agenda/ targets.

Maybe just China targeting the old and frail as they haven't the people to cope with the care.

Countries are just make believe borders in the elite world?

(my head is full of flu so not on full capacity. hope this makes sense? )

{Ed033's Note - The flu jab cannot work anyway because each new flu is different from a previous flu, and they make the flu jab before the new flu has appeared.

but as you've already pointed out, it's highly likely that the medical cartel intentionally put other stuff in the vaccines.

Yes, I think it's a bio weapon and we have to hope it doesn't spread somewhere else like it has in China (if what we're told is correct in the news).

Personally, i think taking Liposomal Vitamin C (such as Altrient C) helps in avoiding Flu, although it's fairly expensive stuff.

09 Feb 2020 22:07:21
Two squeezed nature grown lemons into a 1.5 litre bottle of water.

Natural local honey in hot drinks.

Don't think old 'schooled', think old 'native'.

I am pretty sure every cure has been derived from a natural element (and then synthesised) .

All the answers are in nature, 'they' just don't want Us to see that.

{Ed033's Note - Are you saying you have the flu because you forgot to take honey and lemon?

10 Feb 2020 09:45:14
Haha, no, Ed. That's what I am using to, try and get rid. Just something to make me feel a bit proactive.

I don't really know any way to stop a virus, other than an antivirus. But that seemingly doesn't work either, or it was a guise for a delivery system for something else they are injecting people with?

{Ed033's Note - We have no idea what they are injecting into us.

09 Feb 2020 12:12:55
If the Sun was 93 million miles away we wouldn't be able to see it with our naked eyes, let alone the alleged 'stars' over 4 light years away Our eyes by themselves can't physically see anything millions of miles away?

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Feb 2020 13:40:06
My first thoughts on this was how to go about measuring the distance Our eyes are limited too.

Then I realised that we don't actually see across any distances at all. It, is the light from the object we are looking at, that travels the distance. We just process the light data. Poor eyesight corrupts this data.

So you would need to know the limits of light travelling through the aether to know how far we can see.

{Ed033's Note - It's a difficult one as we each have our own personal viewing dome or personal atmospheric dome (PAD), if you've seen this concept in any videos.

09 Feb 2020 20:45:05
Just watched some PAD stuff. Seems to all come back to the perspective thing? Which to me, makes sense.

I won't start a new post because it links in with your OP.



The solar orbiter mission is set to launch soon. But it still looks like they are using paper, tinfoil, plastic and the famous lunar plastic orange tape.

{Ed033's Note - What we might have to realise is that there is no such thing as millions of miles above us anyway.

09 Feb 2020 22:41:09
To me its a seductive argument because I would have to only go on facts I can not test myself.

And the sextant alignment adds weight. I have never seen a 'debunking' video on sextants.

Too ill to process ATM.

09 Feb 2020 12:11:33
Do You Still Believe That Weather Modification Technology Is Simply Science-fiction?

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Feb 2020 13:44:18
I thought this was Photoshopped so I went to the site where the radar images comes from, to find the original footage.

I couldn't find that but I did notice, on live radar feed, there was something like these patterns occurring over Valencia.

really doesn't look natural, but there maybe an explanation for it.

{Ed033's Note - They are manipulating the weather anyway. I went to that tiempo.com site and they seem to represent rain graphically as triangles as standard some of the time. The triangles as rain doesn't mean anything if that is the case.

09 Feb 2020 20:49:54
Maybe you are seeing things differently to me as I didn't see triangles.

More like spoke lines around a circle, a bit like a bicycle wheel.

Not sure why they would represent data that way? and sure doesn't look natural.

{Ed033's Note - I looked at some rain over Barcelona and somewhere else and it showed some of the rain as triangles. I saw the the circle spoke wheels in the video and don't know why they would represent data that way, but the main idea is that they are manipulating the weather anyway.

08 Feb 2020 13:25:45
Wagging the Moondoggie: Parts 1-2 by Dave McGowan

{Ed033's Note - Thanks Rian

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Feb 2020 19:34:22
Never really thought about this before, until now.

Just saw some program (not relevant) that mentioned balancing.

When something is in balance its called the 'centre of gravity'.

This enforces the belief of the theory known as gravity. Henceforth if you hear it enough it becomes fact to the point you don't question it so in your world it is fact.

Worth a though for a moment is it not? . The only way to disprove gravity (if it is wrong) would be to have a mass greater than the Earth.

Arguments can be made of the planets movements (we are told they have more mass than the Earth), but I never see anything like an effect from them moving 'around us'. They are just luminaries?

{Ed033's Note - Until someone proves otherwise, i'll call planets and stars - luminaries.

Is Gravity Incoherent Magnetism?







The Incoherent Magnetics of Gravity

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Feb 2020 12:26:33
NASA and the alleged Vacuum of Space.

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Feb 2020 12:03:44
Space Suits and the alleged Vacuum of Space.

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Feb 2020 22:22:40
2 Serious Questions for NASA - Orange Juice and Sounds in a vacuum. During the Apollo Moon landings, the audio guys didn't get the memo that we shouldn't be able to hear sounds in a vacuum.

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Feb 2020 01:44:13
Orange juice aside (I need to look into that) I have seen many NASA videos, where the physics of what they have told us about the MOON, just don't add up.

The footage of the astronaut asking for his colleague to push down on his (space) helmet, is a prime example. There are many more.

I have not heard the knocking sounds video before, though. Could that be added, FakeFX? . (again i need to look in to this) .

Why is the rum always empty? .

Oh.

{Ed033's Note - The answer is that they shot all the Moon video on Earth?

08 Feb 2020 22:22:55
I believe so, Ed.

Was that just to get the Russians to try? . I don't know. I don't think so.

The interesting thing is pretty much the only thing Russia and the rest of the World are in alignment with is space and the antarctic treaty.

Now why is that?

{Ed033's Note - Such a good point, that all countries are aligned with everything to do with Space and Antarctica.

05 Feb 2020 10:28:10
Where is the other half of the Moon?

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Feb 2020 20:13:13
Hi. The moon itself doesn't emit any light like the sun. What we see when we see the moon is sunlight reflected off the moon. The phase of the moon is how much of the moon appears to us on Earth to be lit up by the sun. So here we can only see the half of the moon that is being hit by the sunlight. As the moon orbits the earth throughout the month then we see more Phases through to full moon. Hope that helps.

{Ed033's Note - I'm expecting to see some of the other half dimmed out. If i shine a light on any sphere so that half of it is illuminated, i would at least see some of the other half but it would be dimmer.

05 Feb 2020 23:45:42
Hi. but you are looking at the moon from Earth, the light is coming from the sun. So the sun is hitting the whole of the front side of the moon that faces the sun. The half we cannot see is the back of the moon from the suns perspective. So if you shone a torch at a pool ball it wouldn’t light up the back of the ball for example.

06 Feb 2020 07:35:31
The Earth is mostly covered in the most unreflective substance known to humankind. Water. So no sunlight would get reflected from the Earth to the Moon.

Oh, hang on wait.

06 Feb 2020 22:22:29
The part of the Moon that is lit is too uniform, we should see a brighter part lit and a dimmer part lit.

06 Feb 2020 23:54:20
I’m not really sure what you think you are seeing then? Throughout the month we see the moon go through different phases until full moon. If the video is saying there is only half a moon then where does the rest of it suddenly appear from and disappear to during the month. We see a small crescent all the way to a full moon, and the video doesn’t address that or make any explanation for just saying there’s only half a moon.

{Ed033's Note - If anyone has watched all of the videos i put up here over the last 9 pages, then they may be open to the idea that the Moon might not be a rock floating in outer space around 238,000 miles away and we've been lied to about it.

07 Feb 2020 02:18:36
Rhetorically.

The hotspot 'brighter' part:

Is that just what we could think because of the 'Mr Blue Marble' effects on the 3D version of a 2D scan?

Is that effect because of water or atmosphere on the Earth? . We are told the Moon has none. (Maybe a little water, but let's not be pedantic :) ) . So therefor no hotspot?

NASA has Moon dust. Why is the Moon so luminous/ reflective? . Has NASA run tests? I know they say its spiky/ sharp as hell. Isn't it what, apparently caused the 'Jade Rabbit 2' or rather 'Yutu 2' to malfunction? .

Why is there no proof of the reflectiveness of lunar rock. It looks dull to me. Maybe i need to put the images in Photoshop and flip the polarity? . (Ah, that's better)

These are questions I am asking myself as much as anyone because that's where the truth lies. (see what I did there? ) .

{Ed033's Note - I don't get how you could have uniform light then no light.

How far away can the Moon be if it brightly lights up the clouds immediately around it, but the clouds just a little further away from being immediately around it are not lit at all?

If you've seen other videos suggesting the Sun is a projection, could the Moon be a projection?

You uploaded a video where a guy in the early 60s said he thought the Moon was plasma.

Could it be that all the luminaries are plasma?

I'm not saying any of the above is correct, but we're being lied about the Moon somewhere along the line.

08 Feb 2020 22:10:08
I don't believe we have reached the Moon, Ed. I just want to make that clear. I am just trying to find proof that no one can deny.

I mentioned this before about the clouds in front of the Moon, from ones perspective, are more brightly lit. There is a 'theory' which has taken weight in the mainstream, called 'Mie scattering'.

This is just a theory, though. So, again it is a choice of what you believe. I have questioned a lot of late, what I believe.

This is one thing that I have noticed over the last few months, is that I have taken theories as fact. Because they are accepted in the mainstream.

That doesn't make them the truth. It just means they are accepted as such. And almost forced upon us.

As for luminaries being plasma. Is plasma not in a state of flux? which would make it hard to define a stationary surface? .

There is a debate. If you have two sextants at a measurable distance apart. A measurement from both calculates that the Sun has a 32 mile diameter and is 3000 miles away.

Now I bet Ernest Shackleton would say that a sextant is pretty reliable.

I do not know measurements for the Moon, but I guess that it would be similar.

{Ed033's Note - Yes, if the Sun was 93 million miles away we wouldn't be able to see it with our naked eyes, let alone the alleged 'stars' over 4 light years away Our eyes by themselves can't physically see anything millions of miles away.

04 Feb 2020 13:57:03
Dinosaurs Never Existed?

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Feb 2020 07:41:33
It is strange how common folk like farmers and the working class find giant humanoid-like skeletons. And then, schooled 'archaeologists' find dinosaurs.

Back in the day there was hundreds of articles of finding giants, in 'news' papers. Now with just get the propaganda sheets we don't see these anymore.

I seem to remember you posting about a red giant in Iraq, Ed. Found by a few US soldiers in the recent Iraq war. I am recalling that right? .

Interesting subject that leads nicely into the 'fallen Titan' subject.

{Ed033's Note - I think it was a 15 foot red haired giant in the caves of Afghanistan.

06 Feb 2020 07:58:05
Giant humans existed

07 Feb 2020 15:27:58
That picture is serious clickbait SM!

08 Feb 2020 22:18:30
Haha. But the thing is, Rian. They do not appear deformities of the human race as we know it. Their proportions are beautifully aligned with their size.

Does this mean that they must be a separate race? . A race of giants? Maybe the last dying genetic threads of an ancient race that once ruled this realm? .

04 Feb 2020 12:34:45
Antarctica - Sorry We're Closed!

Agree1 Disagree0

05 Feb 2020 11:43:01
excellent.

{Ed033's Note - I take it you got something you were looking for out of it?

05 Feb 2020 14:59:40
Well the whole subject of the enormous secrecy around Antarctica is something I have been trying to find more about the last couple of years. It is so hard to find anything of substance. This guy at least confirms my suspicion that it is nothing to do with environmental concerns. I remember a couple of years ago you posted something about some very high profile people visiting a particular spot in Antarctica.

I'm also interested in the pyramids down there, and of course I expect you are interested from a flat earth perspective. There is definitely something being kept from us imo.

{Ed033's Note - I would imagine that lots of people would like to circumnavigate around Antarctica - just to explore.

And why couldn't anybody just go ahead with a boat and do that? The answer is, a military would physically stop you.

06 Feb 2020 07:45:17
How come they never find any plastic/ rubbish waste in Antarctica?

I mean its found everywhere else on the planet, even where humans don't inhabit.

You would expect the fact that, there are not many people down there to clean up the rest of the worlds waste, it would be a massive pile? .

But no, it's pristine.

03 Feb 2020 13:17:20
{Ed033's note - Hi Southern Monkey, i think people might want to see the below video first before the one you submitted.

The outward flow of civilisation on a flat Earth

Agree0 Disagree0

03 Feb 2020 18:23:38
Hypothesis that goes further than the video above.

03 Feb 2020 11:48:35
Viktor Schauberger - Comprehend and Copy Nature Documentary

Agree0 Disagree0



Conspiracy Talk


Conspiracy Talk 2


Conspiracy Talk 3


Conspiracy Talk 5


Conspiracy Talk 6


Conspiracy Talk 7


Conspiracy Talk 8


Conspiracy Talk 9



Posting Form

Please Log In or Register

 

 

 

 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass