Talk Conspiracy Member Posts

 

hsf's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




hsf's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To hsf's Posts

 

 

To hsf's last 5 rumours posts

 

To hsf's last 5 rumour replies

 

hsf's rumours posts with other poster's replies to hsf's rumours posts

 

03 May 2018 22:34:33
Lots of military movement going on down here near Salisbury Plains. As I'm typing at least 5 Helicopters and 5 Chinooks flew over.
Been like this for the last week or so. Lived here for 29 years and never seen so much in such a short period of time.

hsf

1.) 05 May 2018 12:26:35
I live near Corfe and the lulworth tank ranges have been extra busy!


 

 

22 Oct 2017 17:21:55
What do you guys think about the Titanic and it possibly being switched with an almost identical ship in "the Olympic" as an insurance scam?

hsf

{Ed033's Note - That's exactly what happened plus they decided to make a human sacrifice as well at the same time as the insurance scam.

Titanic Conspiracy Documentary


1.) 23 Oct 2017 03:01:10
I don't know about the whole human sacrifice thing, but it definitely looks like it's been switched. The pictures especially from the under water shots compared to the pictures of the Olympic look very similar.


2.) 30 Oct 2017 15:21:14
Hi, ED33
I have come across a new theory in why the Titanic sank. I was watching a link you had posted called EUROPA-The Last Battle (part 1) when at 14-35, they talk about 3 powerful men worth billions that went against the establishment regarding the Federal Reserve and just so happened to be on the Titanic. The 3 men lost there lives on board the ship and so to the opposition to the Reserve. As you know Ed there is plenty of people who have lost their lives in Air, Sea and Motor accidents.

{Ed033's Note - What seems to have happened is that all the powerful/rich people who were against the agenda including the formation of the Federal Reserve were invited onto the Titanic Ship (That was really the Olympic ship) as they knew the ship was going to be deliberately sunk with most people being sacrificed (including the powerful/rich people who were against the agenda)


3.) 08 Nov 2017 23:27:38
Was there not more windows or port holes on one of them can't remember which. But surely that proves which one sank.

{Ed033's Note - yes, it's provable that the Olympic was sunk as the Olympic and Titanic were not exactly the same including different numbers of port holes.


 

 

21 Aug 2017 11:49:05
Probably a little much at once, but I sat and watched these 3 videos in 2 days, all 9 hours.

Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson on the Joe Rogan Experience
In these videos, they discuss Egypt, Gobekli Tepe, The Younger Dryas and a global flood 12,800 years ago.



youtube.com/watch?v=0H5LCLljJho

This one also includes a 3rd guest - Michael Shermer
youtube.com/watch?v=tFlAFo78xoQ

Fascinating stuff to listen too, especially the stuff on Gobekli Tepe and the Sphinx.
Is there a piece of human history that is genuinely missing?

hsf

{Ed033's Note - If people have seen the Planet of the Apes film with Charlton Heston as lead role, i interpret that film as the apes who are covering up the past (advanced humans, artefacts), is analogous to the Elite run Smithsonian Institute and others covering up our past (giants, hobbits, hominids, advanced humans, advanced artefacts, ETs?)


1.) 21 Aug 2017 13:01:03
I see what you're saying with that, it makes sense about the advanced humans.

I genuinely don't think it's about ET's or anything like that. I'm with Randall Carlson that a comet hit the earth during the Younger Dryas period and wiped out a huge amount of life. Possibly leading to lost knowledge and lost civilisations. There is an insane amount of evidence to suggest this happened, with the extinction of 80% of the mega mammals in North America, plus the Black Matt layer, the nano-diamonds and the lack of mega mammal skeletons above the black mat layer.

It's all very convincing stuff and I look forward to hearing more, especially as now mainstream archaeology is getting behind this theory and pumping money into it!

When you consider the Human race has been around in it's modern form for around 200,000 years, it seems very naive to assume that it took us 199,000 years to become technologically advanced, especially when you have megalithic structures like Gobekli Tepe the one under the sea near Italy that date back over 10,000 years.

{Ed033's Note - I hope you don't mind me not closing my mind off to anything ET I'm open to the possibility that the 'Cone Heads' for example being non human or ET.


2.) 21 Aug 2017 15:07:38
Rogan sells out regularly.
He sold out for fame and to avoid being forced off youtube through censorship.
If u want an indication of what people believe, look how many people tuned into watch Eddie Bravo on the Rogan show two weeks ago compared to this show.

Apart from that these specialists tell you things we know nothing about. Ie they talk about the time the first comet hit it caused an ice age. Well this is apparently what happens when the sun gets blocked by the dirt and dust getting kicked up into the atmosphere.

Then they go on to say and about 1600 years later another comet hit to cause a massive rise in temperature. How about after the dust settles, the sun being able to peer back in, it would naturally start to melt the ice and in turn create clouds witch would then rain and then flood.

But a bigger question gets left unanswered. We are covered in water where did it come from? Because these same specialists try to say water was first brought to the planet by a comet. But these specialists also try to say the water has resided as well, meaning there was a lot more at one point. It's all best guesses.

We cannot get honest clear pictures of the deepest of our oceans or the deepest parts of space or even real full pictures of the earth or the moon that passes in front of our Earth. They can give false evidence all day though.

Humanity in the past most probably where massively advanced. We today just like to think we are. So I do hope there is hidden tech because at least we could then be seen to be advancing in space and seas as we like to believe we can.

{Ed033's Note - Yes southampton, it's a lot of guess work going on with Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson on this subject.


3.) 21 Aug 2017 15:17:05
Ed, I'd love it to be ET's I really would. I'm open to the idea, I just don't think it's likely is all.


4.) 21 Aug 2017 23:23:43
Sorry for not replying sooner
Yes that is what my opinion would be on these two.
ASwell ed
Thanks for replys.


 

 

14 Aug 2017 12:51:36
Ok so I looked at the pictures of the Pyramids on Mars and there was only one that stood out, but it's (in my opinion) clutching at straws.



In this image for example.
"the face" is just an example of shadows making something look different and it was a lower resolution photo.



The Pyramid looks like it's just a sand dune, probably formed over a large rock.



And "the city" looks to be a similar situation as the Pyramid, except smaller rocks for foundation.

I saw a few other images that were either very low resolution or just clearly faked/ enhanced to suit the purpose. But there are so many fake photo's out there that it's difficult to find the originals.

I'm not saying I'm right, just offering a possible explanation. Do you have any other images I should look at?

hsf

{Ed033's Note - The most compelling argument for artificial structures on Mars (assuming the satellite images are the raw data of Mars) are the non fractal ( i.e. straight lines as an example) in the images and the geometrical alignments of possible structures.



As non fractal and / or impossible geometry coincidences of alignments mean an intelligent life form was on Mars at some point.

We also have the theory that Avebury 'complex' on Earth is a mini version of Cydonia on Mars.


goo.gl/f7V5M


https://goo.gl/scZw4


1.) 14 Aug 2017 15:05:26
Look for the Dark side of the moon lol.
The face once caught my eye when they came out but then I watched a doc with more images and apparently it's shade cast as it moves kind of ruined it.
I also see the lines mention and that too looked interesting .
They also claim to have a picture they claim is similar to the Grand Canyon.
Apart from that they have it first before releasing.
And they apparently employ people to air brush things out they don't want people to see.

{Ed033's Note - Exactly, they do their best to hide anything of interest by using air brushing.


2.) 14 Aug 2017 16:33:37
I will be honest Ed, I find the geometry stuff really difficult to believe. I'd imagine we'd see similar patterns with satellite views of arid deserts on Earth or on the Moon.

There has also been evidence of straight lines used in nature (although it is exceptionally rare).



Sunrise, Tessellated Pavement, Eaglehawk Neck, Tasman Peninsula, Tasmania, Australia

"According to Dr. Chloe Bulinski, a Professor of Biology at Columbia University, straight lines are all around us, from the compound eyes of insects to the collagen fibers in connective tissue. Dr. Bulinski cites Tasmania’s Tessellated Pavement, an inter-tidal rock platform that looks like the floor tiles in your kitchen, as a particularly fine example of naturally occurring straight lines. "




Pyrite Cubes are a natural formation.



Basalt Columns
"It is the nature of basaltic lava cooling that allows this to happen: this lava is hotter and moves faster than other kinds. As it cools from the bottom up and from the center outward, long fractures form columns that at times take on astoundingly clear-cut hexagons. The whole process is called columnar jointing"
-google answers

There are a few good examples of angles in those pictures too.

{Ed033's Note - For anyone interested there is more information on what's so special about the geometry at Cydonia in the Monuments of Mars book by Richard C. Hoagland.


3.) 14 Aug 2017 16:44:36
I would also like to go on and state that I really want there to be proof of ET life, either present or historically. It's something I've looked at for years and the reason I bought a telescope to be honest with you, I just wanted to see a UFO! Lol.

As I've said before on here, there are astronomical numbers that more or less prove we are not alone. As our galaxy alone has an estimated 100 billion stars, a large percentage have planets around them. So if you apply that theory to the rest of the galaxies in the universe and we're talking about the possibility of trillions of planets. There is no way that the the Earth is a 1 in a trillion.

That being said, I've seen no evidence that 100% proves it. There are circumstantial bits of evidence, a few anomalies here and there and a few questionable testimonies / confessions but nothing definitive. Yet.

{Ed033's Note - The Brookings Institute recommended back around 1960 that as it was inevitable that evidence of ET life would be found, it should be hidden from we the people.

When the Viking mission around 1980 (which had 3 soil tests for life) tested for life in the martian soil, 2 tests were positive for life and 1 failed. The one that failed also failed on Earth and was a deliberate failing test, so that they could then say the Viking mission tests failed to find any life in the soil on Mars.


4.) 15 Aug 2017 22:54:00
One good bit of footage that hasn't been proven fake or tampered hsf.
Is a ufo hovers in Jerusalem flashes then takes off.
nothing they build at the minuet with the tech they admit to having, is possible to do that.
Literally takes off in a flash.


5.) 15 Aug 2017 23:01:32
Also I will add
Two weeks ago I saw three lights in a triangle.
Not the hole thing if it was anything at all just lights through the cloud traveling north west had not a whimper of sound.
Where there was so many clouds I only see it for two seconds then thick cloud blocked it from view.

I wasn't even going to mention it where I see it so briefly and as you do it makes you question whether you see anything.
But thinking about it I deffently see something slip through the clouds to big to be a commercial drone.


6.) 16 Aug 2017 15:15:30
This is the thing though, people automatically assume a UFO is aliens, when the reality is, it's just unidentified.

I live near Amesbury and they have an RAF base (Boscombe). When I was working a few years ago in the summer, we saw multiple strange aircraft taking off and landing. All different shapes it was kind of crazy. I actually thought Aliens had landed at first! But it was fairly obvious that it was just testing after a closer look.

I've also heard a few "booms" at night which could be sonic booms from an aircraft such as the Aurora. But, I live near Salisbury plains and they have regular tank/ artillery drills there. Oh and a pro-tip for you guys. Don't EVER go onto Salisbury plains at night.

1). You don't know what you're stepping on such as unexploded shells.

2). Tanks do not stop easily (don't ask! )

3). The ammunition they use is LIVE.

4). When being escorted off, they're not very polite about it ¬_¬ Especially to 14 year old kids who are just exploring 8-) lol.


7.) 16 Aug 2017 21:31:12
Yes hsf I too believe most ufos seen are human built,
Dr Greer has some good info on it.
Only thing I think is a bit of are the meet ups he talks of and photos of (extra dimensional beings)
But u never know .
And I get the heads up cheers
Lol.


 

 

12 Aug 2017 20:14:49
I read a theory that said Apollo 11 went to the moon, but the astronauts and footage we saw was filmed in a studio, as they didn't want the public to see a tragedy if it happened. But then I remember watching a live video of several astronauts being blown up when a rocket failed not long after launch. So who knows?

hsf

{Ed033's Note - What you saw was a rocket being blown up, you didn't see astronauts being blown up. it's possible 1 or more of the astronauts weren't blown up.

Are the Crew Members of 1986 Space Shuttle Challenger Still Alive?


goo.gl/trT55


1.) 12 Aug 2017 21:02:44
There are Rumours that Stanley Kubrick used the set that was used in James bonds "diamonds are forever"? The moon buggies scene in the film is meant to be the same set? I'm not sure. Good to have a bit more on the page. I've been following it since it's been live again.

{Ed033's Note - In the first half of the documentary Kubrick's Odyssey, Jay Weidner shows how Stanley Kubrick faked the Moon landing videos for NASA. In the second half of the below documentary, Jay Weidner explains secrets hidden in Stanley Kubrick's movie, The Shining.

Below is Part 2 of a low quality 15 minute out-take of Kubrick's Odyssey (showing how Kubrick did it). Part 1 is also low quality, but if it intrigues anyone, you can purchase a high quality version.


2.) 13 Aug 2017 12:11:02
They didn't mind showing people killed in 9/11
And they don't mind showing people bombed in war .
It's all part of vampirism get people low to feed of the worry.
To me honestly if I train for a space mission and this is a dream come true.
I already know I could float off in space no chance of rescue.
Drones round the other side of the world is done by apparently bouncing frequencies of the ionosphere .
And how do you know they are not doing the controlling from and "outpost"as u put it with nibiru.
Even if you double the distance require to travel the circumference of the world .
It's not even a inch on the travel needed for mars.
And mars is not in a fix postition not that I'm saying u couldn't work out a math or formula to work out where it would be.
Just that doing the two things are massively far apart.
Look at the continent of Africa double and triple on nasa cgi.
I'm not saying space travel is fake or impossible.
I'm saying with what the science tells us of space the tech they use does not travel it.
And to believe in space travel u must be to some degree believe conspiracy.
Becuase in my view space travel can not be done with the tech they talk of.

And I heard u talk of a star that is in the red spectrum.
Does this include the in far red to
Becuase red and in far red are two different things.
Even when we talk of proof the earth our planet! Moves
The mickelson and Morley experiment failed .
They say the fualcort pendulum proves movement too but this is proven to change direction of travel.
I'm not saying we don't move or anything.
Or we don't travel space.
Just that most of what is said as fact and truth is in fact a theory.

And I agree most are the best theory to stand up to date but they are still a theory and a best guess.
When it comes to telescopes
There are what I call real telescopes that u directly look though and see an image with your eyes.
But real deep search telescopes are scanning frequency and wavelengths then the computer creates the image.
But who has programmed the computer and is what this person sees what others would see?
They depict space in films movies and documentaries .
Even when it comes to maps they document certain continents a lot bigger than they are.

To make an enemy look more threating to school kids.
They say we have sate-lights that gives signal around the world.
If so why deep sea cables and so many antennas being put up.
They say the moon is how far?
Really u can see objects on the moon.
So why can u not see something on earth from 290,000 miles away it's just inside what nasa say the true edge of the atmosphere is .
They also say we know more about space than our own planet and the deep sea.
I reckon there is one reason for this .
Many humans will never be able to disprove space but if they lie about what is on the planet they could be disproven.

But it don't really matter how much they prove to be lying .
People will still eat there crap.
Please feel free to dig holes in my post .
This is why I come on here.
I don't come on hear to dig holes in what they love .
As I to still dig for space films to watch .
Good day peoples.


3.) 13 Aug 2017 13:24:37
Foot not miles sorry.
Edge of our atmosphere 330,000 ft
Late night last night lol.


 

 

 

hsf has no Banter Posts

 

 

hsf's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

13 Oct 2018 09:59:24
There is an interesting timeline regarding Porton Down.


1916: A facility at the 3000-acre site is established

1920: Research starts on whole-body protection against mustard gas

1930: Porton Down scientists conduct tests on the London Underground to assess vulnerabilities to chemical or biological attack

1940: Site expands and biological warfare research starts

1946: scientists conduct research into war gases and nerve agents with the help of volunteer military personnel

1989: Nerve agent trials cease

1997: Chemical Weapons Convention comes into force, requiring all members to dispose of chemical weapons and their production facilities

1999: Wiltshire Police begin a four-year investigation into the human experiments at Porton Down nearly 50 years earlier

2008: MoD awards £3m compensation to 360 veterans of the tests without admission of liability

2013: Dstl scientists test samples from Syria for Sarin.

hsf

 

 

Click To View This Thread

02 Aug 2018 12:34:29
How so Ed? I've not agreed with anything you've said. All I've said is that they used metal tools and that if they were able to forge Bronze and Copper, then they can melt Granit and Limestone.
That has nothing to do with disagreeing with the mainstream.

Everything I mentioned in the above post was mainstream views, so tell me. Where did I agree that they were more advanced than the mainstream says? In fact, my 2nd link is to the University of St. Andrews - a government funded page.

Nice try Ed, but I think now that you've try to spin my words, I'm done. Cya.

hsf

{Ed033's Note - An overreaction hsf, more like you know we can come up with more examples the mainstream never explains and you'll have to admit the mainstream are full of spin and lies.


 

 

Click To View This Thread

02 Aug 2018 02:12:01
Of course they have some hidden technologies, I guess I'm reading into the words "black tech" wrongly and assuming you're talking about teleporters, black hole bombs, cloaking fields etc. You know, things that are edging on breaking the laws of physics, or just flat out ignoring them. I guess that comes from my dislike for Alex Jones. So I am happy to be corrected on that front, unless you are actually referring to teleporters etc.

Regarding Sacsayhuaman, it is fascinating how they built such complex structures. However, contrary to your comment about their primitive tools, you'll find they were actually using metal tools.
peruenroute.wordpress.com/2012/02/27/sacsayhuaman-how-incas-built/
I would also imagine that they're able to melt Granite (1260°C melting point) and Limestone (825°C melting point), as they were forging Bronze (950°C melting point) and Copper (1085°C melting point), they were also very good with mathematics, so it doesn't seem so farfetched to think they built these things without modern day technology or better. It was likely just a forgotten technique, as they didn't have a sophisticated enough writting system, in order to keep a record of it. It's actually argued that they didn't have a writting system at all.
www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/HistTopics/Inca_mathematics.html.

hsf

{Ed033's Note - Hsf seems to be agreeing that the builders were more advanced then the mainstream says.


 

 

Click To View This Thread

01 Aug 2018 14:24:20
Ok Rian, Moon landing. As Neil deGrasse Tyson says, show me your best piece of evidence and tell me what it will take for you to be proven wrong.

hsf

 

 

Click To View This Thread

01 Aug 2018 00:40:06
Rian, if you used a telescope to look at something really small would you see it? The answer is no, it would just be a monumental blur. For that you need a microscope, not a telescope designed for viewing the moon from orbit.
We have been to the Moon already, don't be so silly.

youtube.com/watch?v=RMINSD7MmT4

And are you talking about the missing pixels and the dust particles on the camera lense?

p1 and Ed033. Black tech seems to just be an appeal to ignorance fallacy and sounds like that typical religious view point, "Science can't prove it, therefore God". You need to show me some conclusive evidence in order to convince me, as I've never come across anything that proves it. I'm not dismissing the idea, as secret technologies have always been around (Greek Fire for example), but I need proof.

p1, Ancient civilisations being more advanced than we are? Not a chance in my view, there is no evidence for mass manufacturing with metals, plastics or polymers, which would be essential for things like electricity, which is essential for power and the progression of technology. Plus medicine has never been better than it is today, when you consider the ancient Egyptians (pioneers of the time) were diagnosing things like Dysentery as an having too much blood, prescribing a bloodletting as a remedy, then you kind of get the picture.

Another way to gauge it, is to look at the Tribes of the African plaines, or the tribes of the Amazon, 12,000 years ago, that was us.
It's likely that some are more advanced than we initially believed though. A few examples: Sumer (4500BC), knew that there were 8 planets in the solar system + Pluto and they knew that they revolved around the Sun, not around us. They also developed a written language over night almost.

Gobekli Tepei (between 10,500BC and 8000BC), it was believed that a sophisticated society was almost impossible back then, as we were hunter-gatherers which weren't capable of creating megalithic structures, then they discovered Gobekli Tepei and dated it to around 12,000 years old. 7,000 years older than Stone Henge and 50 times larger.

hsf

{Ed033's Note - There's loads of evidense/proof for black tech and previous civilisations being more advanced than the mainstream says. A lot of it has been pointed to on this site over the years.

You believe and repeat the mainstream version but if there was any substance to the mainstream version we'd all believe the mainstream version. Those of us using our own minds require proof from the mainstream, but all we get is spin and lies.


 

 

 

hsf has no Banter Replies